Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Employment, global value chains and spillover effects in Turkey

2783
Firms’ involvement in global value chains is increasing rapidly and it is vital for policy-makers to understand the direct effects on domestic employment, as well as spillover effects on the economy. This column sheds light on participation trends in Turkey and its repercussions for jobs.

In a nutshell

Turkey’s manufacturing sectors post faster growth through backward linkages in global value chains, whereas services sectors do so through forward linkages; agricultural sectors have the lowest participation.

There are significant associations between participation in global value chains and employment creation at the sector level in Turkey.

There are significant indirect effects of participation in global value chains on employment for the manufacturing sectors.

Economies’ participation in global value chains (GVCs) is witnessing unprecedented growth. Integration in GVCs occurs principally through the import of intermediate products used in the country’s exports and/or the supply of intermediate products to third countries’ exports. Several economic indicators are influenced by this integration into GVCs with effects depending on the extent of integration.

Previous research has stressed the significant association between international trade, productivity and employment, among other economic outcomes. For example, my recent study uses the world input-output tables to document a significant association between participation in GVCs and labour productivity at the sector level in Turkey (Mohamedou, 2020).

A study by Feenstra and Hanson (1996) links increasing demand for skilled workers with growth in trade in intermediate products. Banga (2016) shows that integration into GVCs is significantly related to employment in India and that increasing imports of intermediate products used in the country’s exports result in a kind of labour displacement at the sector level. Mohamedou and Tengku (2021), report a significant association between backward linkages, domestic value-added exports and employment at the sector level in Japan.

In this column, we shed some light on the importance of international trade in general and trade in value-added, in particular, for employment formation at the sector level in Turkey. Figure 1 shows trends in GVC participation, backward linkages (foreign valued-added export [FVA]), and forward linkages (Indirect value-added export [DVX]), which appear to be growing from 2001 onwards.

 

Figure 1. GVC participation, backward and forward linkages for Turkey, 2000-14

Source: Mohamedou (2019)

 

Figure 2 depicts trends in backward and forward linkages for the manufacturing, services, and agricultural sectors in Turkey from 2000 to 2014. The manufacturing sectors post faster growth through backward linkages, whereas services sectors do so through forward linkages. Agricultural sectors have the lowest participation.

 

Figure 2. Backward and forward linkages change from 2000 to 2014

Source: Mohamedou (2019)

 

The associations between GVC-related variables and employment in Turkey

 

Another of my studies analyses the effects of backward and forward linkages on employment for the manufacturing, services and agricultural sectors (Mohamedou, 2019). It shows that backward linkages contribute to the job creation process for manufacturing sectors. This suggests that the imports of intermediate products used in the country’s exports are used in conjunction with domestically produced goods, which stimulate both employment and productivity.

The study also shows that forward linkages are negatively associated with employment in the services sectors. A likely interpretation of this finding is that forward linkages of service sectors into GVCs are associated with significant outsourcing of their inputs internationally.

For example, services firms tend to offshore a significant portion of their inputs overseas. This can be observed in financial services, where financial firms tend to outsource their data management or specialised tasks. Another example is the outsourcing of basic design tasks in architectural services (Heuser and Matto 2017).

Therefore, higher forward linkages might be associated with significant losses in jobs. Finally, the study does not find a significant association between GVC-related variables and employment for agricultural sectors.

 

Spillover effects of GVC-related variables on employment

 

My study also suggests that job creation is susceptible to significant effects that arise as a result of the cross-industry input-output interconnectedness, which is captured via the input-output weight matrix concept (Mohamedou, 2019).

The indirect effects are mainly observed for the manufacturing sectors in which high backward and forward linkages in one sector deteriorate employment formation in sectors connected to it via the input-output weight matrix.

A plausible explanation is labour mobility. This suggests a relocation pattern is observed among workers towards sectors with higher participation in GVCs and thus higher productivity and incomes, which leads to a declining number of employees in the sectors.

Overall, my research sheds light on the importance of participation in GVCs through backward and forward linkages for the job creation process at the sector level in Turkey. There are significant associations between GVC participation and employment, as well as spillover effects. It is important for policy-makers to understand the mechanisms through which these spillovers effects take place.

 

Further reading

Baldwin, Richard, and Anthony J Venables (2013) ‘Spiders and snakes: offshoring and agglomeration in the global economy’, Journal of International Economics 90(2): 245-54.

Balsvik R (2011) ‘Is Labor Mobility a Channel for Spillovers from Multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian Manufacturing’, Review of Economics and Statistics 93: 285-97

Banga, Karishma (2016) ‘Impact of Global Value Chains on Employment in India’, Journal of Economic Integration 31(3): 631-73

Feenstra, RC, and GH Hanson (1996) ‘Globalization, Outsourcing, and Wage Inequality’, American Economic Review 86(2): 240-45.

Grossman, Gene M, and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg (2008) ‘Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring’, American Economic Review 98(5): 1978-97.

Heuser, C, and A Matto (2017) ‘Services trade and global value chains’, in ‘Measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development’, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Kummritz, V (2016) ‘Do Global Value Chains Cause Industrial Development?’, CTEI Working Paper No. 2016-01.

Mohamedou, ND, and Tengku, MC (2021) ‘Impact of Backward Linkages and Domestic Contents of Exports on Labor Productivity and Employment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Data’, Journal of Economic Integration 36(4): 607-25.

Mohamedou, ND (2019) ‘Impact of Global Value Chains’ Participation on Employment in Turkey and Spillovers Effects’, Journal of Economic Integration 34(2): 308-26.

Mohamedou, ND (2020) ‘Inter-Industry Spillovers in Labor Productivity and Global Value Chain Impacts: Evidence from Turkey’, ERF Working Paper No. 1430.

Tags: , , , , ,

Most read

Beyond job creation: how can Egypt’s gender gap in work be closed?

More than 2 million jobs are needed each year to absorb new entrants into Egypt’s labour market and raise the country’s employment rate. The job challenge is even more acute for women, whose labour force participation remains low despite recent gains in education. This column reports on the second Development Dialogue, an ERF–World Bank Group joint initiative, which brought together students, scholars, policy-makers and private sector leaders at the American University in Cairo to consider how the country’s gender gap in work can be closed.

Digitalisation, global value chains and regional integration in MENA & SSA

Participation in global value chains is vital for countries pursuing structural transformation and inclusive economic development. This column summarises new evidence on how much production processes have been globalised in Africa and the Middle East relative to other regions; whether this process has taken place with partners within or outside the region; and whether it has taken place more in manufacturing or services.

How trade policy can reduce MENA’s cereal import vulnerability

Heavy dependence on imported cereals, combined with climate change, water scarcity and geopolitical uncertainty, continues to threaten food resilience across MENA. This column explains how an inclusive trade policy can play a key role in making the region’s food security less vulnerable to shocks.

The political economy of algorithms in the Middle East

The Middle East is entering a new political-economic era – one in which algorithms, data and artificial intelligence may become as strategically important as oil once was. Across the region, governments are investing heavily in digital infrastructure, smart governance and AI-driven economic transformation. This column outlines how AI and algorithmic governance are reshaping power, inequality and state capacity in the region.

The risks of a two-speed AI economy in MENA

Much of the debate about artificial intelligence in the Middle East and North Africa focuses on how many jobs it will replace. As this column explains, the more important challenge is that the new technology is likely to create a two-speed labour market, where countries with the capacity to invest in digital infrastructure and skills move rapidly ahead while others struggle to keep pace. Unless governments combine credible national reforms with targeted regional cooperation, AI could widen, not reduce, the economic divides across MENA.

From mega-investment to mega-productivity: closing MENA’s conversion gap

Across the Middle East and North Africa, governments are investing heavily in infrastructure, technology, diversification and new industries. Yet capital accumulation alone does not guarantee productivity growth. As this column argues, the region’s deeper challenge is its ‘investment-to-productivity conversion gap’: ensuring that large-scale investment translates consistently into stronger firms, technological diffusion, skills and better jobs. A different metric of success is required: not how much capital is deployed, but how much productive capability that capital leaves behind.

Sanctions and conflict: why corruption changes the equation

Why do sanctions produce such different political outcomes across the countries that have been targeted? This column reports research examining the role of pre-existing corruption in shaping the relationship between sanctions and subsequent conflict or political instability. The evidence indicates that trade sanctions are associated with higher conflict-related deaths where pre-existing corruption is high.

Why energy efficiency still struggles to attract finance in Egypt

Egypt has reduced energy subsidies and gradually adjusted domestic energy prices toward cost-recovery levels, improving the economic case for energy efficiency investments – but financing has not kept pace. Drawing on structured interviews with banks, developers and public officials, this column traces why energy efficiency projects in the country still struggle to attract capital, and sets out how a ‘financing ladder’ used elsewhere – from revolving funds to risk guarantees to green bonds – could close the gap.