Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Corporate ownership and performance in the United Arab Emirates

6078
While state ownership of companies is widely thought to lead to inefficiencies, in the United Arab Emirates, it has proved to be a pillar of good corporate performance. This column describes the country’s experience over the period 2008-16, evaluating the performance of listed companies and banks, and comparing indicators across privately owned companies and those in which the government holds majority stakes.

In a nutshell

State ownership helps corporate performance by listed companies and banks in the UAE: the advantages include improved management, support and accountability.

Ownership structure, structural reforms and improved regulations should lead the process to achieve greater diversification for oil-rich countries like the UAE as they adjust to the new normal of the oil price.

It is essential to find the best formula of private/public partnership and corporate ownership to aid the reform agenda for further diversification and sustainable growth.

In the past two decades, there has been growing interest in the relationship between the ownership structure of companies and their performance. In particular, there has been much debate about the effect of government ownership on corporate performance.

On one side of the debate, state ownership is seen as bringing a ‘helping hand’: here the view is that the higher the proportion of state ownership in a company, the more capital subsidy will be provided by the government. On the other side of the debate, state ownership is seen as bringing a ‘grabbing hand’: here the view is that the government will extract more of a company’s profit as a result of its ownership to the benefit of politicians and bureaucrats.

In the context of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), state-owned enterprises are a major contributor to GDP and employment. According to a 2014 study by the Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations, they account for around 80% of GDP and employment.

There are many reasons why the country has decided to have state-owned enterprises. Those like Etisalat, a telecommunications operator, are prominent forces in strategic sectors of the economy where the government wants to play a key role.

When it comes to the long-term success of the country, the government is a patient investor that does not look for quick wins. Instead, the government usually couples commercial objectives with social objectives that do not pay returns on investment in the short term, but they ensure the country’s sustainable development, especially in meeting the ever-increasing energy demand. State-owned enterprises such as Emirates Aluminum and Emirates Steel are major forces behind the UAE government’s steps to diversify the economy away from hydrocarbons.

State ownership of listed companies in the UAE

As publicly owned shareholders increase, state-owned enterprises have better insider information about the company that is not widely available. Since the state usually holds shares over long periods of time, it has the authority to engage in extensive and continuous information gathering that matter for the company’s operations, thus further reducing information problems and improving corporate performance.

Evidence from listed companies on the Dubai Financial Market and the Abu Dhabi Stock Exchange confirms the positive effects of government ownership on most indicators of performance, as measured by return on assets, profits earned and price-to-book value. Consistently better performance indicators have reduced the need for financing by companies the higher the share of government in ownership.

The evidence shows that, in the case of the UAE, corporate performance indicators are influenced positively in a controlled system managed by state ownership. Performance is further strengthened by access to capital, which decreases debt levels and the associated cost of debt service to optimal levels.

State-owned banks in the UAE

It appears that government ownership also plays an important role in supporting better performance of listed banks. Better access to inside information, more resources and credibility give the state-owned banks an advantage when dealing with counterparties, either to mobilise sources of financing or to expand their market base.

In addition, state ownership matters as it has increased confidence in the stability of banks, enabling them to enjoy higher ratings and access to finance, compared with other banks where government ownership does not constitute a dominant share.

Policy implications

At the macro level, it is important to evaluate the optimal ownership structure in order to judge the prospects of growing economic activity, and solidifying indicators of performance by resorting to restructuring of existing corporations, if necessary. This assessment is important for the UAE economy, which has surpassed its regional comparators in terms of economic diversification and positioned itself on the path towards further diversification to celebrate the last barrel of oil.

At the core of growing non-energy sectors is establishing the right structure of corporate ownership to achieve the best performance. The results attest that the role of government ownership has improved companies’ performance, having access to sufficient capital, with less need for borrowing. Across banks, government ownership has built confidence in the stability of the banks, enabling them to enjoy good ratings to enlarge the pool of funding for their intermediation and credit support for the non-energy sector of the economy.

The way forward

State ownership helps corporate performance in the UAE: the advantages include improved management, support and accountability, which are reflected positively in key performance indicators. Future research should complement this evidence by evaluating the impact of government ownership on productivity and contributions of the corporate sector, including banks, to the macro economy.

The results will shed further light on the UAE’s experience and inform economic management in similar economies of the MENA region, particularly resource-rich countries.

Ownership structure, structural reforms and improved regulations should lead the process to achieve greater diversification for oil-rich countries like the UAE as they adjust to the new normal of the oil price. It is essential to find the best formula of private/public partnership and corporate ownership to aid the reform agenda for further diversification and sustainable growth.

The views expressed here are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as those of the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates.

 

Most read

Beyond job creation: how can Egypt’s gender gap in work be closed?

More than 2 million jobs are needed each year to absorb new entrants into Egypt’s labour market and raise the country’s employment rate. The job challenge is even more acute for women, whose labour force participation remains low despite recent gains in education. This column reports on the second Development Dialogue, an ERF–World Bank Group joint initiative, which brought together students, scholars, policy-makers and private sector leaders at the American University in Cairo to consider how the country’s gender gap in work can be closed.

Digitalisation, global value chains and regional integration in MENA & SSA

Participation in global value chains is vital for countries pursuing structural transformation and inclusive economic development. This column summarises new evidence on how much production processes have been globalised in Africa and the Middle East relative to other regions; whether this process has taken place with partners within or outside the region; and whether it has taken place more in manufacturing or services.

How trade policy can reduce MENA’s cereal import vulnerability

Heavy dependence on imported cereals, combined with climate change, water scarcity and geopolitical uncertainty, continues to threaten food resilience across MENA. This column explains how an inclusive trade policy can play a key role in making the region’s food security less vulnerable to shocks.

The political economy of algorithms in the Middle East

The Middle East is entering a new political-economic era – one in which algorithms, data and artificial intelligence may become as strategically important as oil once was. Across the region, governments are investing heavily in digital infrastructure, smart governance and AI-driven economic transformation. This column outlines how AI and algorithmic governance are reshaping power, inequality and state capacity in the region.

The risks of a two-speed AI economy in MENA

Much of the debate about artificial intelligence in the Middle East and North Africa focuses on how many jobs it will replace. As this column explains, the more important challenge is that the new technology is likely to create a two-speed labour market, where countries with the capacity to invest in digital infrastructure and skills move rapidly ahead while others struggle to keep pace. Unless governments combine credible national reforms with targeted regional cooperation, AI could widen, not reduce, the economic divides across MENA.

Sanctions and conflict: why corruption changes the equation

Why do sanctions produce such different political outcomes across the countries that have been targeted? This column reports research examining the role of pre-existing corruption in shaping the relationship between sanctions and subsequent conflict or political instability. The evidence indicates that trade sanctions are associated with higher conflict-related deaths where pre-existing corruption is high.

From mega-investment to mega-productivity: closing MENA’s conversion gap

Across the Middle East and North Africa, governments are investing heavily in infrastructure, technology, diversification and new industries. Yet capital accumulation alone does not guarantee productivity growth. As this column argues, the region’s deeper challenge is its ‘investment-to-productivity conversion gap’: ensuring that large-scale investment translates consistently into stronger firms, technological diffusion, skills and better jobs. A different metric of success is required: not how much capital is deployed, but how much productive capability that capital leaves behind.

Why energy efficiency still struggles to attract finance in Egypt

Egypt has reduced energy subsidies and gradually adjusted domestic energy prices toward cost-recovery levels, improving the economic case for energy efficiency investments – but financing has not kept pace. Drawing on structured interviews with banks, developers and public officials, this column traces why energy efficiency projects in the country still struggle to attract capital, and sets out how a ‘financing ladder’ used elsewhere – from revolving funds to risk guarantees to green bonds – could close the gap.

The weak bread chain: cereal supply risks in six MENA economies

The Middle East and North Africa is one of the most food-import-dependent regions of the world, particularly for staple cereals such as barley, maize and wheat, and particularly in six countries – Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia. As this column reports, diversifying import sources has become an essential strategy for strengthening food security and improving resilience to geopolitical and climate-related disruptions.