Economic Research Forum (ERF)

The Covid-19 pandemic and Egyptian migrant workers

1443
How is the global pandemic affecting the many migrants from Egypt working in Europe, the Gulf and other Arab countries? This column looks at the challenges they are facing as well as their families back home, who are often highly dependent on remittances.

In a nutshell

The immediate impact of the pandemic on Egyptian migration and remittances depends on the destination countries; in the next phase – of co-existence with the virus – more variables will change, constantly affecting migration and remittances.

The crisis has highlighted the crucial role of migrant workers in supporting European economies; but many are forced to continue working regardless of the risk of exposure to the virus.

The situation of migrants in the GCC countries varies according to their working conditions and level of skills: those in jobs characterised by harsh working and living conditions are most at risk of infection.

Covid-19 is one of the greatest shocks of recent times, affecting the world economy on many levels. The focus on shocks to the macroeconomy, as well as to wages and the informal economy, has overshadowed something else greatly affected by the pandemic, namely international migration and remittances. (Effects of the pandemic on the internal migration of Egyptians and on asylum-seekers within Egypt will be discussed in future columns.)

International migration

Direct and indirect effects of Covid-19 on Egyptian international migrants depend on the destination of emigrants. Egyptian emigrants are highly concentrated in Europe as well as the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries and other Arab countries, mainly Jordan.

In Europe, approximately 900,000 Egyptian migrants are mainly concentrated in France, Germany, Italy and the UK. In the Gulf and other Arab countries, approximately 5.5 million Egyptian migrants are concentrated in Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

International migrants in Europe

In Europe, migrant workers are mainly in jobs that are most hit by the Covid-19 crisis, including agriculture, domestic and care work, the food industry, construction, tourism and transport. Many of these sectors need to continue operating to ensure the survival of the population. This has highlighted the crucial role of migrant workers in supporting European economies.

Migrant workers, especially undocumented migrants, are the least protected workers in Europe. Problems include employment conditions, access to healthcare, unemployment or social benefits, public healthcare, housing and, on top of all that, their residency and work permits.

Employed in crucial sectors, migrants in Europe are forced to continue working regardless of the risk of exposure to the virus. Their residency and survival, especially undocumented migrants, depend only on their jobs. Losing their jobs means losing their only source of income, and with limited or no access to any social benefits, they are also risking their survival.

Therefore, there is no choice for them but to keep working, risking their health and that of those around them. The high cost of medical services (and the fear of sharing data about their undocumented status with governments) delay migrants from seeking help in case they get infected. At the same time, given the sectors in which they are most concentrated, workloads have increased and social distancing is not applied, exacerbating the health issues.

During the next phase of the crisis in Europe – which some call co-existence with the virus – issues related to social distancing and hygiene need to be enforced among everyone to minimise any further risks. Realising the role of the migrant workers in Europe, and their contribution to the limited functioning of the economy, together with the enforced measures in the co-existence phase, this could improve the situation of migrants in Europe.

In this context, residency and work permits become the main concern for migrant workers. Those who remained in their destination countries have been given an extension to the renewal of residency or work permits, given the closure of government offices. Those who returned to their countries of origin right before the lockdown are risking expiry of their residency and work permits prior to returning to their destination countries and potentially losing their jobs.

Last but not least, European governments, international institutions, NGOs and labour unions are highly concerned with the situation of migrants in Europe. They work on providing them with information and guidance. For those who lost their jobs, they try to provide them with some form of assistance to be able to live through the crisis. The communities where they live and their vulnerability is not only risking their own health, but in the next phase of coexistence is risking a second wave of infections if hygiene measures and social distancing are not implemented properly.

International migrants in GCC and Arab countries

The situation of migrants in the GCC countries varies according to their working conditions and level of skills. Those in jobs characterised by harsh working and living conditions are most at risk of infection. These overlooked conditions are now creating the most risk of spread of the disease among migrant workers’ communities, which could lead to it spreading across countries. This is especially concerning given that infections in the GCC countries are mainly among migrants and foreign workers.

At the same time, indirectly, through the effect of the lockdowns on the slowdown of business activities, demand for energy has slowed, pushing down oil prices. As oil is the main source of government revenues, the expected slowdown is expected to affect demand for workers in economic sectors other than the oil and gas sectors.

Layoffs and wage cuts are the immediate impact of the slowdown. This is not affecting new flows of international migrant workers, but the stocks are also expected to fall. In 2018 and 2019, new work permits for Egyptian emigrants were mainly issued by Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, the UAE and Qatar. Those in Saudi Arabia alone formed roughly 48% of total new work permits issues in 2018, with the other four countries together forming around 45% of the total new work permits issued in 2018.

The slowdown in demand for workers – directly in the oil and gas sectors and indirectly in other economic sectors – is expected to lead to a slowdown in new numbers of migrants and even lead to the return of some migrants.

Migrant remittances

This economic slowdown is not only expected to affect the number of migrants, but also the economic impact of these changes in migration patterns. Remittances to Egypt were worth approximately $30 billion in 2019, the highest in Egypt’s history. Over 75% of these remittances originated from Saudi Arabia (39% on its own), Kuwait, the UAE, Jordan and Qatar.

The expected economic slowdown from falling oil revenues, which in turn result from the global economic slowdown driven by the lockdown and the spread of Covid-19, will negatively affect the size of remittances flowing to Egypt.

Remittances are the major source of foreign currency for the Egyptian economy, along with revenues from tourism and the Suez Canal (two major sources of revenues that are also seeing a severe drop). The lockdowns, border closures and general fear have stopped tourism altogether; and Suez Canal revenues have dropped significantly with the slowdown in trade, production and global demand.

Since remittances are used directly by recipient households, the drop is likely to affect their consumption patterns significantly. It could push some households, who are highly dependent on remittances, towards poverty.

In conclusion, the immediate impact of the Covid-19 virus on Egyptian migration and remittances depends on the area of destination. With the phase of co-existence with the virus, more variables will change constantly affecting migration and remittances.

Most read

Making trade agreements more environmentally friendly in the MENA region

Trade policy can play a significant role in efforts to decarbonise the global economy. But as this column explains, there need to be more environmental provisions in trade agreements in which developing countries participate – and stronger legal enforcement of those provisions at the international level. The MENA region would benefit substantially from such changes.

Jordan: navigating through multiple crises

Jordan’s real GDP per capita is today no higher than it was 40 years ago. While external factors have undoubtedly had an adverse effect on the country’s economic outcomes, weak macroeconomic management and low public spending on investment and the social sectors have also played a substantial role. This column explores what can be done to reduce high public debt, accelerate private sector development and enhance social outcomes.

Iran’s globalisation and Saudi Arabia’s defence budget

How might Saudi Arabia react to Iran's renewed participation in global trade and investment? This column explores whether the expanding economic globalisation of Iran, following the lifting of nuclear sanctions, could yield a peace dividend for Saudi Arabia, consequently dampening the Middle East arms competition. These issues have attracted increased attention in recent times, notably after a pivotal agreement between the two countries in March 2023, marking the resumption of their political ties after a seven-year conflict.

Egypt and Iraq: amenities, environmental quality and taste for revolution

The Middle East and North Africa is a region marked by significant political turbulence. This column explores a novel dimension of these upheavals: the relationship between people’s satisfaction with, on one hand, the amenities to which they have access and the environmental quality they experience, and, on the other hand, their inclination towards revolutionary actions. The data come from the World Value Survey collected in 2018 in Egypt and Iraq.

Global value chains and domestic innovation: evidence from MENA firms

Global interlinkages play a significant role in enhancing innovation by firms in developing countries. In particular, as this column explains, participation in global value chains fosters a variety of innovation activities. Since some countries in the Middle East and North Africa display a downward trend on measures of global innovation, facilitating the GVC participation of firms in the region is a prospective channel for stimulating underperforming innovation.

Labour market effects of robots: evidence from Turkey

Evidence from developed countries on the impact of automation on labour markets suggests that there can be negative effects on manufacturing jobs, but also mechanisms for workers to move into the services sector. But this narrative may not apply in developing economies. This column reports new evidence from Turkey on the effects of robots on labour displacement and job reallocation.

Food insecurity in Tunisia during and after the Covid-19 pandemic

Labour market instability, rising unemployment rates and soaring food prices due to Covid-19 are among the reasons for severe food insecurity across the world. This grim picture is evident in Tunisia, where the government continues to provide financial and food aid to vulnerable households after the pandemic. But as this column explains, the inadequacy of some public policies is another important factors causing food insecurity.

Manufacturing firms in Egypt: trade participation and outcomes for workers

International trade can play a large and positive role in boosting economic growth, reducing poverty and making progress towards gender equality. These effects result in part from the extent to which trade is associated with favourable labour market outcomes. This column presents evidence of the effects of Egyptian manufacturing firms’ participation in exporting and importing on their workers’ productivity and average wages, and on women’s employment share.

Do capital inflows cause industrialisation or de-industrialisation?

There is a clear appeal for emerging and developing economies, including those in MENA, to finance investment in manufacturing industry at home with capital inflows from overseas. But as the evidence reported in this column indicates, this is a potentially risky strategy: rather than promoting industrialisation, capital flows can actually lead to lower manufacturing value added and/or a reallocation of resources towards industries with lower technology intensity.

Sustaining entrepreneurship: lessons from Iran

Does entrepreneurial activity naturally return to long-term average levels after big economic disturbances? This column presents new evidence from Iran on trends in entrepreneurship among various categories of firm size, sector and location – and suggests policies that could be effective in promoting entrepreneurial activities.