Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Human capital and regional disparities in Turkey

Turkey has a longstanding problem of uneven economic development across its regions. This column explores the interactions between the market access of central and remote parts of the country, the varying levels of human capital accumulation in those places, and the wage returns to education. The research evidence indicates the potential of regional policy to reduce inequalities.

In a nutshell

Regional disparities demarcated by a developed west and an underdeveloped east are widening in Turkey.

Not only regional incomes but also development of education-based human capital are rapidly polarising among Turkish regions.

Evidence shows that there is still room for policy: the influence of policy-insensitive measures on education is less pronounced compared with the influence on wages.

Regional inequality is one of biggest socio-economic problems facing the Turkish economy. Indeed, it is a longstanding problem: our knowledge of the early Republican era confirms the existence of a west-east dichotomy.

There are numerous sources in the country’s history for regional disparities: the collapse of ties with eastern countries following the downfall of the Ottoman Empire; the loss of young people after the First World War and the Turkish War of Independence; the inability to raise and distribute capital at regional scale, largely owing to the profit and capital allocation of the Ottoman system; the priority given to macroeconomic development and country-level economic fundamentals; and so on.

These issues seem to form the backbone of inequalities. But after the 1980s and the liberalisation of the Turkish economy, there has been a worsening of imbalances at the regional level. Numerous scholars discuss the reasons behind these large differences in production style, income level, employment structure and so on. In general, the consensus is that factor allocation is the key driving force behind the deepening of spatial inequalities.

Underpinning these concerns, human capital accumulation deserves special attention. More specifically, the determinants of the development of educational human capital should be elaborated in order to understand the potential impact of regional policies on spatial development.

On the one hand, individuals invest in education as they expect higher earnings with increased education levels. Since firms with greater access to markets will have a larger surplus of funds to be distributed to workers, we expect that in central locations there will be stronger incentives to invest in education in.

On the other hand, there are some other micro factors that influence individuals’ decisions to increase their education levels, such as cultural factors, rules and norms at the regional level, legal rights related to labour, experience, etc.

While the former explanation relies on the ability of a region to transfer more premiums to educated workers, the latter basically spends more time on individual issues that are thought to be more policy-sensitive.

Our research traces the roots of human capital development by revisiting these two contradictory views as we have enough reasons to believe that the development of educational human capital influences regional development. Eventually, there is a chicken-egg problem – the so-called ‘endogeneity’ issue. Human capital development seems to be not only a determinant but also an outcome of this whole process.

Therefore, we first investigate whether regions’ overall profitability (thus their market access) influences the development of educational human capital. At this early stage, we rule out the impact of a sub-channel over returns to education (thus wage distribution). Next, we use returns to education, the level of education and market access in the same framework by taking account of endogeneity.

The education level of Turkish regions that are not remote (thus central) are observed to be higher. Without controlling for the impact of wages (returns to education) but taking account of various other issues, market access of locations influences people’s educational decisions.

At this stage, the problem is the rigidity of market access; that is, historically, there is a very limited change in the distribution of province-level market accessibility. So, once a region is central, it is central. For these regions, as well as the remote ones with lower market access, few policy measures are in effect. Therefore, if we rely on these results, development of education-based regional human capital seems policy-insensitive.

But we are highly concerned about the inability to account for returns to education and some other individual factors that can also affect educational investments. Moreover, possible bi-directional links and the endogeneity issue deserve more attention. As a final attempt and in order to focus on the individual characteristics; returns to education (wages), educational attainment and market accessibility are integrated into the same framework.

Our findings should be central to policy-making. Importantly, accessibility of regions heavily influences returns to education. Assuming that the firms in central locations with high market accessibility are more profitable, a natural outcome is the ability to distribute higher wage premiums to individuals.

But unexpectedly, this does not directly cause higher development of educational human capital. The impact of market access on education is no longer visible when returns to education is further controlled for.

This, we believe, is something positive in terms of regional and human capital-based policy-making. That is, the strong influence of market access on wages signals the inability of any policy measure to influence the distribution of wages (leaving the regional wage determination completely to markets).

On the contrary, the failure to establish a causal link between education level and market access broaches a discussion of the possibility of policy measures to combat disparities in the development of educational human capital.

Further reading

Karahasan, Burhan Can, and Firat Bilgel (2018) ‘Economic Geography, Growth Dynamics and Human Capital Accumulation in Turkey: Evidence from Regional and Micro Data’, ERF Working Paper No. 1233.

Most read

Why the West got rich and the Middle East did not

Today’s rulers of the three largest Middle Eastern economies all look to religious authorities as a key source of legitimacy. Drawing on a broad sweep of historical analysis, this column explores what this might mean for the region’s economic future. One notable danger is that the types of people who would push for policies that promote long-run growth are excluded from the political bargaining table.

Why Turkish growth ended

Following a period of rapid economic growth, the Turkish economy has slowed significantly since 2007. This column argues that these economic ups and downs reflect institutional improvements in the aftermath of the country’s 2001 financial crisis, followed by an ominous slide in the quality of these economic and political institutions.

Implications of the current low oil prices for MENA countries

The current low oil price environment, in part driven by the US shale oil revolution, has important macroeconomic implications for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). This column reports research evidence on its likely impact on both oil-exporting and oil-importing countries in the region.

Prospects for development with democracy in the Arab world

What are the prospects for democracy in the Arab world? This column expresses the hope that as conflict-afflicted countries embark on their programmes of economic reconstruction, autocratic institutions will not be re-established under the pretext of the need for a speedy and steady recovery. The optimal path of development necessarily includes robust growth, equity as well as democracy.

An agenda for reducing income inequality in the Arab countries

What can be done to reduce income inequality in Arab countries? This column explores issues of measurement as well as potential policy measures. It concludes by calling for a new multipurpose pan-Arab survey that would allow for an evidence-based decision-making process on the impact of proposed policies on poverty and inequality.

The United Arab Emirates’ dilemma

As energy-producing economies strive to reduce their reliance on oil revenues, they must strike a balance between the competing demands of fiscal sustainability and steady growth of the non-energy sector. This column outlines how the United Arab Emirates is addressing this challenge.

Freedom for women is crucial for economic progress in MENA

The Middle East was once the cradle of civilisation: can it prosper once again? Looking back at lessons from the European Enlightenment, this column argues that if the region wants to advance economically, it needs to advance in terms of its treatment of women. Female agency is central to understanding the West’s technological leadership of the past two centuries.

Inequality in higher education: Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia

Attainment of higher education is strikingly unequal in Egypt and Tunisia, and a little less so in Jordan. This column reports research showing that in all three countries, family background is the primary driver of inequality. Particularly in Egypt and Tunisia, public spending on higher education is regressive, with the result that what purports to be a meritocratic and equitable system in reality perpetuates inequality.

Oil exporters’ responses to the US fracking boom

What are the implications of low oil prices for the economic and political stability of Arab oil-exporting countries such as Saudi Arabia? This column explores the impact of the US fracking boom on Arab oil revenues – and how policy-makers in these countries should respond.

Pension reform that avoids harming MENA labour markets

To tackle the deficits in their pension systems, should governments in Arab countries raise social security contributions, reduce pension levels or increase the statutory retirement age? This column summarises the results of research assessing the costs and benefits of different pension reforms in terms of their impact on different generations and on the labour market.