Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Retooling development aid in the 21st century

1216
Following a series of shocks from the global financial crisis to the Covid-19 pandemic and the food and fuel crisis, it remains as important as ever for development agencies and other stakeholders to deliver budget support to emerging market and developing economies. This column identifies several factors that policy-makers should consider as they design funding streams for development projects. At their core is the need to strike an appropriate balance between funding conditionality and recipient countries’ ownership and development priorities.

In a nutshell

Budget support is an important instrument for development, supporting policy reform and providing counter-cyclical support during periods of crisis.

Research and independent evaluations show that budget support has been effective in a wide range of circumstances, from fragile situations to middle-income countries, particularly when it is underpinned by strong analytics, timely technical assistance, a good understanding of the political economy dynamics, and strong country ownership.

Reform and financing are not magic bullets: budget support should be designed carefully, with policy-makers through policy dialogue, focusing closely on striking the right balance between conditionality and country-level ownership.

Budget support is an important instrument for development aid, providing key counter-cyclical support during global economic crises and supporting the reform priorities of developing countries. But what is the record on budget support’s past performance?

Independent evaluation indicates that budget support performs as well as traditional project financing in terms of meeting development objectives (see Figure 1a). At the programme level, econometric analysis shows that success depends on both donor and recipient factors, including programme design, policy dialogue and the timing of support. But much is still unknown about what makes budget support effective at the level of individual operations, especially on the recipient side.

Figure 1: Budget support performs equally as project support

Source: Author. Figures 1a and 1b are based on World Bank data. DPF is development policy financing (budget support); IPF is investment project financing.

A comprehensive review of empirical evidence and quantitative analysis at the country level indicates that budget support works well. It contributes to sustained policy improvements in macroeconomic management, business regulation, social policy and public sector governance. But the policy impact depends on the country context, the process of policy dialogue, and the type and duration of the support (see Figure 1b).

The research also shows that economic policy reforms have been more effective than certain areas of public sector governance and social policy. A large evidence base in economic reform, as well as the lack of short-term, tangible benefits in public sector reform, may explain these differences. Support for social policy reform has shown success even in fragile and conflict-affected states, as well as in times of crisis.

Lessons learned

Despite the optimism and expectations following the 2005 Paris declaration, the use of budget support declined over the 2010s. Several factors drove the shift. Some new donor country governments were disinclined to continue financing ‘reform’, preferring traditional bricks-and-mortar projects, and debating (without much reference to the evidence base) aid effectiveness indicators and objectives.

High-profile cases involving political repression (such as Ethiopia in 2006) or corruption (such as Mozambique in 2015) also undermined confidence in the instrument, despite its focus on institutional strengthening and accountability in public finance. Support was also diluted by the erosion of confidence in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. These strategies came to be seen as donor requirements that lacked government ownership, prepared largely by outsiders in the form of World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) staff.

Meanwhile, expectations of sharp increases in aid flows (such as at the Gleneagles Summit) fell short of donor pledges and the idea of budget support bore the brunt of the shortfall. Periods of severe economic distress, such as the global financial crisis of 2007-09, saw peaks of fast-disbursing budget support, resulting in short-term balance-of-payments financing with limited conditionality, rather than sustained support for long-term structural reforms.

In parallel, new donors outside the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) – including China – also emerged, with a different aid framework, incentives and objectives. This raises new questions about the role of foreign assistance and aid instruments.

Reinventing budget support

Regardless of the post-Paris declaration shortcomings, budget support has a vital role to play in addressing the challenges of the 21st century. To live up to its potential, budget support needs to be redesigned – customised to the specific needs of recipient countries and donors, and adapted to the current international financial architecture. In this sense, policy-makers should consider the need for:

  • A deeper understanding of the political economy and specific development conditions of recipient countries.
  • New strategies for addressing fiduciary concerns.
  • Realistic conditionality focused on critical reforms relevant to longer-term development outcomes and public goods.
  • Clarification of the division of labour among donors, based on financial and advisory capacity.
  • Realistic projections of development financing, including from the private sector.

It should also be noted that rethinking aid modalities and instruments is critical given the emergence of new technologies, the urgency of global climate change, and growing inequality exacerbated by recent crises.

The case for increasing budget support to accelerate development, to address resilience to crises and to foster public goods is strong. Its focus on policy dialogue, country ownership, inclusive and sustainable growth, and leveraging private resources makes it well-suited to responding to global crises and tackling future challenges. But budget support is not a panacea, nor is it appropriate everywhere. Risks remain and aligning conditionality jointly with authorities must persist to address development priorities and incentive systems to support reform.

And yet, the limitations of official aid underscore the need for both better domestic resource mobilisation and better access to private capital. This includes funding through ‘blended financing – that is, the use of concessional public funds to leverage private development financing.

Coordinated jointly with the private sector arms of multilateral development banks (MDBs), budget support can help to de-risk investments to leverage private investment. Hopes of leveraging ‘billions to trillions’ in private financing have not materialised, but the use of budget support to de-risk and help to strengthen the investment environment are promising.

Several changes could make budget support more effective. It must reflect specific-country context, reflecting local conditions, rather than relying on generic ‘best practices’. It should also remain a viable instrument not only in well-performing low-income countries and in middle-income countries (as rapid counter-cyclical support during crises), but also in more fragile settings where it can provide predictable financing for basic administrative functions.

Country ownership of reforms is critical. But this requires a shared understanding by the authorities and donors, based on robust analytic underpinnings, with policy-makers cognisant of local political economy factors and incentive structures.

Making the case to donors and MDBs for greater use of budget support also requires convincing them that resources are being allocated to development priorities, that allocations are being implemented accordingly, and that funds are being spent efficiently. This requires strong public financial management (PFM). This takes time to build and needs donor flexibility in terms of aligning their support for policy reform and providing fast-disbursing financing during periods of crisis.

Policy-makers should remember that effective budget support is developed through deep country knowledge and a strong development policy dialogue, structured to support collaborative programme design. Further, conditionality should adhere to the principles of criticality, relevance, efficacy, additionality and measurability. It should address concerns of both donors and recipient countries with regards to purpose, transparency and the evidence base.

Budget support can foster new approaches to leverage private capital flows to augment financing for development. Guarantees by MDBs to mobilise long-term private investment have proven effective to date.

Budget support then can help protect the global commons by:

  • Mobilising support for mitigation of and adaptation to climate change and the cross-border management of pandemics.
  • Supporting institutional reforms for sustainability of project finance in support of public goods.
  • Demonstrating measurable results.
  • Operating in tandem with traditional project finance to build essential infrastructure.

Finally, budget support should promote a division of labour between MDBs and bilateral donors, as well as close coordination with the IMF in supporting sound macroeconomic framework in recipient countries This could lead to greater efficiency and coherence, where MDBs hold a comparative advantage as the principal sponsors of budget support in support of regional and global public goods. Budget support should also preserve flexibility to adapt as events unfold.

A recent book argues that budget support is vital for addressing 21st century challenges. It should accompany traditional project assistance, spurring shared growth and building resilience to manage future shocks. Given the ever-growing list of complex and interconnected development challenges facing policy-makers around the world, budget support should be prioritised and delivered with careful consideration.

Further reading

Center for Global Commons (2022) ‘Safeguarding Global Commons for Human Prosperity and Environmental Sustainability – A Discussion Paper’.

Fardoust, Shahrokh, Stefan Koeberle, Moritz Piatti, Lode Smets and Mark Sundberg (2023) Retooling Development Aid in the 21st Century: The Importance of Budget Support, Oxford University Press.

Group of 8 (G8) (2005) ‘The Gleneagles Communiqué’, Gleneagles, Scotland.

Independent Evaluation Group (2021) ‘The World Bank Group’s Approach to the Mobilization of Private Capital for Development: An IEG Evaluation’, World Bank.

Kristensen, Jens Kromann, Martin Bowen, Cathal Long, Shakira Mustapha and Urška Zrinski (eds) (2019) PEFA, Public Financial Management, and Good Governance, World Bank.

OECD (2018) ‘OECD-DAC Blended Finance Principles for Unlocking Commercial Finance for the SDGs’.

OECD (2021) ‘De-risking Institutional Investment in Green Infrastructure’.

OECD (2023) ‘ODA Levels in 2022 – Preliminary Data’.

World Bank (2015) ‘From Billions to Trillions: MDB Contributions to Financing Development’.

World Bank Operations Evaluation Department and International Monetary Fund Independent Evaluation Office (2005) ‘The Poverty Reduction Strategy Initiative: Findings from 10 Country Case Studies of World Bank and IMF Support’.

Most read

EU climate policy: potential effects on the exports of Arab countries

The carbon border adjustment mechanism aims to ensure that Europe’s green objectives are not undermined by the relocation of production to parts of the world with less ambitious climate policies – but it could impose substantial costs on developing countries that export to the European Union. This column examines the potential impact on exporters in the Arab world – and outlines possible policy responses that could mitigate the economic damage.

Financial development, corruption and informality in MENA

Reducing the extent of informality in the Middle East and North Africa would help to promote economic growth. This column reports evidence on how corruption and financial development influence the size of the informal economy in countries across the region. The efficiency of the financial sector in MENA economies reduces the corruption incentive for firms to seek to join and stay in the formal sector.

Green hydrogen production and exports: could MENA countries lead the way?

The Arab region stands at the threshold of a transformative opportunity to become a global leader in green hydrogen production and exports. But as this column explains, achieving this potential will require substantial investments, robust policy frameworks and a commitment to technological innovation.

Climate change threats and how the Arab countries should respond

The Arab region is highly vulnerable to extreme events caused by climate change. This column outlines the threats and explores what can be done to ward off disaster, not least moving away from the extraction of fossil fuels and taking advantage of the opportunities in renewable energy generation. This would both mitigate the potential for further environmental damage and act as a catalyst for more and better jobs, higher incomes and improved social outcomes.

Child stunting in Tunisia: an alarming rise

Child stunting in Tunisia seemed to have fallen significantly over the past two decades. But as this column reports, new analysis indicates that the positive trend has now gone dramatically into reverse. Indeed, the evidence is unequivocal: the nutritional health of the country’s youngest citizens is rapidly deteriorating and requires immediate and decisive action.

Freedom: the missing piece in analysis of multidimensional wellbeing

Political philosophy has long emphasised the importance of freedom in shaping a meaningful life, yet it is consistently overlooked in assessments of human wellbeing across multiple dimensions. This column focuses on the freedom to express opinions, noting that it is shaped by both formal laws and informal social dynamics, fluctuating with the changing cultural context, particularly in the age of social media. Data on public opinion in Arab countries over the past decade are revealing about how this key freedom is perceived.

Exchange rate undervaluation: the impact on participation in world trade

Can currency undervaluation influence participation in world trade through global value chains (GVC)? This column reports new evidence on the positive impact of an undervalued real exchange rate on the involvement of a country’s firms in GVCs. Undervaluation acts as an economy-wide industrial policy, supporting the competitiveness of national exports in foreign markets vis-à-vis those of other countries.

New horizons for economic transformation in the GCC countries

The countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have historically relied on hydrocarbons for economic growth. As this column explains ahead of a high-level ERF policy seminar in Dubai, emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain and robotics – what some call the fourth industrial revolution – present a unique opportunity for the region to reduce its dependence on oil and make the transition to a knowledge-based economy.

Shifting public trust in governments across the Arab world

The Arab Spring, which began over a decade ago, was driven by popular distrust in governments of the region. The column reports on how public trust has shifted since then, drawing on survey data collected soon after the uprising and ten years later. The findings reveal a dynamic and often fragile landscape of trust in Arab governments from the early 2010s to the early 2020s. Growing distrust across many countries should raise concerns about future political and social instability.

Corruption in Iran: the role of oil rents

How do fluctuations in oil rents influence levels of corruption in Iran? This column reports the findings of new research, which examines the impact of increases in the country’s oil revenues on corruption, including the mechanisms through which the effects occur – higher inflation, greater public spending on the military and the weakness of democratic institutions.




LinkedIn