Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Optimal asset allocation for sovereign wealth funds

1061
How should oil-based sovereign wealth funds allocate their investment across different asset classes, such as stocks, bonds and real estate? This column analyses the optimal strategy in light of the need to hedge against adverse oil price shocks.

In a nutshell

Allocation of SWF investments should take account of the rates of return on different assets classes, oil price dynamics and how the size of the fund evolves with respect to the national economy.

The current allocation of 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds in the largest MENA SWFs is optimal given moderate levels of risk aversion and the current volatility of oil prices.

The optimal rate of consumption out of the fund decreases with both risk aversion and oil price volatility.

The sovereign wealth fund (SWF) model, and its proliferation in the last two decades, has been a marked development in the way that national savings can be harnessed to achieve multiple objectives. Serving primarily as vehicles for precautionary saving and intergenerational wealth transfer, they have become significant players in international financial markets, with about US$7.9 trillion in assets under management.

Nearly two thirds of existing SWFs are based on the proceeds from oil exports. Indeed, the phenomenal growth in their size over the last decade is largely due to the massive current account surpluses enjoyed by oil exporters during the extended oil price boom over the period 2007-2014, save for the price drop of 2009.

The biggest SWF – the Government Pension Fund (Global) of Norway – has more than US$1 trillion in assets, and it owns roughly 1.3% of the stocks of every major company around the globe. Following Norway, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates own the largest oil-based SWFs.

For these economies, the SWF assets under management are either at par or exceed the value of their GDP. This highlights their potential role in macroeconomic stabilisation. The drawdowns witnessed in some of the funds, particularly in Saudi Arabia, in the face of the sharp decline in oil prices in 2014 is a case in point.

The focus of this column is how oil-based SWFs should allocate their investment across different asset classes, such as stocks, bonds and real estate. While, at first glance, this seems like the standard asset allocation problem that has been widely studied in the finance literature since the pioneering work of Merton (1969, 1971), the workings of SWFs are different.

The primary reason for the difference is that growth in SWF assets over time comes from two distinct sources:

  • The return on a fund’s investment.
  • The injection of new capital into the fund from the proceeds of oil exports.

Our work in Moutanabbir and Noureldin (2018) focuses on exploiting the interdependence between these two sources of growth since different asset classes, especially stocks, tend to be correlated with oil prices. For the SWF manager, this offers a window of opportunity to implement a dynamic asset allocation strategy, which allows for hedging against adverse movements in oil prices.

So, how are oil-based SWFs currently allocating their investments? There seems to be a convergence towards a 60-40 allocation, with 60% allocated to stocks and 40% allocated to bonds and alternative investments, including real estate and direct equity investments in infrastructure projects.

More recently, the Norwegian government approved a gradual move to a 70-30 allocation, thereby seeking to invest a larger share in stocks. This shows that the primary objective of these funds is to maximise risk-adjusted return, despite the existence of some evidence that they have also been historically used to fulfil strategic objectives related to the development of know-how in particular industries (Dyck and Morse, 2011; Bernstein et al, 2013).

With a large share of their assets invested in stocks, SWFs are indeed taking on financial risk and the return on a fund’s investment is likely to be more volatile. But given their long investment horizon, this is exactly the optimal thing to do.

In a way, this resembles the optimal investment strategy of a young employee saving for retirement. Given that she will be retiring in 40 years’ time, her investment plan can withstand boom and bust cycles in stock markets. As she nears retirement, it is optimal to reduce her exposure to stocks and allocate more to bonds as a low-volatility alternative.

But for a SWF, this age transition does not apply, hence it is optimal to remain heavily invested in stocks to achieve long-term growth in the fund. Some of these insights are discussed in Campbell et al (2003) and Viceira (2001), on which our analysis builds.

So, how should a fund allocate their assets in a manner that also allows for hedging against adverse oil price shocks? The answer to this question varies with the following key parameters of our analysis:

  • The degree of dependence between oil price movements and that of the other asset classes in which the SWF is invested.
  • The extent of oil price volatility.
  • The level of maturity of the fund.

We consider a fund to be mature when its value has become so large such that the annual stream of oil income that is added to the fund is negligible in comparison. The SWF of Norway is perhaps the best example of a mature fund since annual oil revenue represents a mere 2% of its value, compared with about 20% in the case of Saudi Arabia.

Our derived optimal asset allocation dynamic rule shows that the current 60-40 allocation observed in the largest MENA SWFs is indeed an optimal allocation, given moderate levels of risk aversion and the current level of volatility in oil prices. Thus, these funds seem to be behaving optimally in a manner that maximises risk-adjusted returns over a long-time horizon.

But given that oil price volatility has increased in recent months, it is optimal for the funds to increase the allocation to stocks as a hedging mechanism given the historical negative correlation between stocks and oil prices. The Norwegian fund is moving in this direction.

We also specify a rule for the optimal rate of consumption out of the fund – that is, how much the government can take out of the fund to support fiscal operations without compromising future growth in the fund’s value. This rule is also dynamic and intertemporal since high current consumption will lower the fund’s assets and thus necessarily lower the consumption of future generations.

Our derived rule indicates that the optimal rate of consumption out of the fund decreases with both risk aversion and oil price volatility. Indeed, we find the spending rule in Norway (historically 4% since 2001, and now reduced to 3%) to be optimal given an increase in the fund’s maturity and a general increase in oil price volatility since 2014.

The key policy message of our analysis is that the allocation of SWF investments should be viewed dynamically within a responsive framework that takes account of the rates of return on different assets classes, oil price dynamics and how the size of the fund evolves with respect to the national economy.

Further reading

Bernstein, S, J Lerner and A Schoar (2013) ‘The Investment Strategies of Sovereign Wealth Funds’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 27: 219-38.

Campbell, JY, YL Chan and LM Viceira (2003) ‘A Multivariate Model of Strategic Asset Allocation’, Journal of Financial Economics 67: 41-80.

Dyck, A, and A Morse (2011) ‘Sovereign Wealth Fund Portfolios’, Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 11-15.

Merton, RC (1969) ‘Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous Time Case’, Review of Economics and Statistics 51: 247-57.

Merton, RC (1971) ‘Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-time Model’, Journal of Economic Theory 3: 373-413.

Moutanabbir, K, and D Noureldin (2018) ‘Optimal Asset Allocation and Consumption Rules for Commodity-Based Sovereign Wealth Funds’, ERF Working Paper No. 1172.

Viceira, LM (2001) ‘Optimal Portfolio Choice for Long-horizon Investors with Nontradable Labor Income’, Journal of Finance 56: 433-70.

Tags: , , ,

  • Khouzeima Moutanabbir
    Khouzeima Moutanabbir
    Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics and Actuarial Science, American University in Cairo
  • Diaa Noureldin
    Diaa Noureldin
    Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, American University in Cairo

Most read

Making trade agreements more environmentally friendly in the MENA region

Trade policy can play a significant role in efforts to decarbonise the global economy. But as this column explains, there need to be more environmental provisions in trade agreements in which developing countries participate – and stronger legal enforcement of those provisions at the international level. The MENA region would benefit substantially from such changes.

Iran’s globalisation and Saudi Arabia’s defence budget

How might Saudi Arabia react to Iran's renewed participation in global trade and investment? This column explores whether the expanding economic globalisation of Iran, following the lifting of nuclear sanctions, could yield a peace dividend for Saudi Arabia, consequently dampening the Middle East arms competition. These issues have attracted increased attention in recent times, notably after a pivotal agreement between the two countries in March 2023, marking the resumption of their political ties after a seven-year conflict.

Labour market effects of robots: evidence from Turkey

Evidence from developed countries on the impact of automation on labour markets suggests that there can be negative effects on manufacturing jobs, but also mechanisms for workers to move into the services sector. But this narrative may not apply in developing economies. This column reports new evidence from Turkey on the effects of robots on labour displacement and job reallocation.

Global value chains and domestic innovation: evidence from MENA firms

Global interlinkages play a significant role in enhancing innovation by firms in developing countries. In particular, as this column explains, participation in global value chains fosters a variety of innovation activities. Since some countries in the Middle East and North Africa display a downward trend on measures of global innovation, facilitating the GVC participation of firms in the region is a prospective channel for stimulating underperforming innovation.

Food insecurity in Tunisia during and after the Covid-19 pandemic

Labour market instability, rising unemployment rates and soaring food prices due to Covid-19 are among the reasons for severe food insecurity across the world. This grim picture is evident in Tunisia, where the government continues to provide financial and food aid to vulnerable households after the pandemic. But as this column explains, the inadequacy of some public policies is another important factors causing food insecurity.

Sustaining entrepreneurship: lessons from Iran

Does entrepreneurial activity naturally return to long-term average levels after big economic disturbances? This column presents new evidence from Iran on trends in entrepreneurship among various categories of firm size, sector and location – and suggests policies that could be effective in promoting entrepreneurial activities.

Manufacturing firms in Egypt: trade participation and outcomes for workers

International trade can play a large and positive role in boosting economic growth, reducing poverty and making progress towards gender equality. These effects result in part from the extent to which trade is associated with favourable labour market outcomes. This column presents evidence of the effects of Egyptian manufacturing firms’ participation in exporting and importing on their workers’ productivity and average wages, and on women’s employment share.

Intimate partner violence: the impact on women’s empowerment in Egypt

Although intimate partner violence is a well-documented and widely recognised problem, empirical research on its prevalence and impact is scarce in developing countries, including those in the Middle East and North Africa. This column reports evidence from a study of intra-household disparities in Egypt, taking account of attitudes toward gender roles, women’s ownership of assets, and the domestic violence that wives may experience from their husbands.

Do capital inflows cause industrialisation or de-industrialisation?

There is a clear appeal for emerging and developing economies, including those in MENA, to finance investment in manufacturing industry at home with capital inflows from overseas. But as the evidence reported in this column indicates, this is a potentially risky strategy: rather than promoting industrialisation, capital flows can actually lead to lower manufacturing value added and/or a reallocation of resources towards industries with lower technology intensity.

Financial constraints on small firms’ growth: pandemic lessons from Iran

How does access to finance affect the growth of small businesses? This column presents new evidence from Iran before and during the Covid-19 pandemic – and lessons learned by micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.