Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Unemployment and the marginally attached

394
While the standard definition of unemployment is useful for international comparisons, it may not be adequate for assessing the degree of labour market attachment in many developing countries. This column reports evidence from Turkey that there is a significant group of ‘marginally attached’ individuals who appear to be non-participants in the labour market but are in fact ready for employment when work is available.

In a nutshell

The official unemployment rate conceals identifiable segments of the population who are keen to respond to the employment generation capabilities of the labour market.

These ‘marginally attached’ individuals deserve as much attention as the unemployed.

By using additional measures of unemployment that relax one or more of the tests used to classify non-employed individuals, it is possible to obtain alternate indicators of labour market conditions.

While the unemployment rate is the single most widely used statistic for providing a snapshot of labour market conditions, there is considerable controversy over its measurement. The International Labour Organization (ILO) proposes three tests: to be counted as unemployed an individual must be without work, currently available for work and seeking work.

The first and second criteria are not controversial; the third, however, is subject to debate. To satisfy the third criterion, the individual must take specific actions that qualify as ‘search’ in a given reference period: the longer the period for satisfying the search criterion, the higher the unemployment rate.

Leaving this aside, the ILO recognises that the condition of ‘seeking work’ may not be meaningful in countries where the labour market is largely unorganised, where job search can operate through non-standard channels, and where the self-employed constitute a large segment of the labour force.

Our research addresses the limitations of the standard unemployment definition and the three-state labour market classification on which it rests: employment, unemployment and non-participation (Özkan-Değirmenci and Tunalı, 2014). We analyse data from the Household Labor Force Survey collected by the Turkish Statistics Institute for the period 2000-02.

One way of assessing the adequacy of the unemployment definition is to compare transition rates from non-participation and unemployment to employment. If we find that a considerable number of non-participants flow into employment, we might conclude that the three-state classification is not very useful.

The next logical step is to identify sub-groups among non-participants that are responsible for these flows, determine in what ways they are different from the unemployed and, if necessary, augment the unemployment definition and the three-state classification.

In the data for Turkey, employment is typically at its peak in the third quarter (Q3), lowest in the first quarter (Q1) and somewhere in between in Q2 and Q4. This pattern is attributable to seasonality in agricultural activity and tourism services. While nearly 90% of those employed in the first quarter are also employed in the second, about 84% of the non-participants and only 37% of the unemployed remain in their previous state.

Conditional on not being in the labour force in 2002 Q1, 14% of individuals become employed one quarter later. Conditional on being unemployed in 2002 Q1, 38% of them become employed one quarter later. Thus, an individual who is classified as unemployed is 2.7 times more likely to get employed than someone who is classified as non-participant.

But in Q1, the number of non-participants is 11 times higher than the number of unemployed individuals. This indicates that for every unemployed individual who successfully gets a job, there are four non-participants who also successfully make this transition.

Put another way, for every five previously non-employed and newly employed individuals, only one of them was unemployed three months earlier, while four were non-participants. This is an astounding statistic that underscores the hazards of focusing on the unemployed alone, and the inadequacy of the three-state classification of the labour market.

We conclude that there are significant flows from non-participation to employment. In fact, there is abundant evidence that some individuals who did not seek work during the reference period and were therefore excluded from the labour force display some level of attachment to the labour market.

This might arise because during economic downturns, some non-employed individuals give up on search when their efforts fail to produce results. Seasonal economic fluctuations push others outside the labour force, even though they are ready to re-enter when work is available. This leads to the idea of the ‘marginally attached’ – a group of individuals among the non-employed who are the best candidates to be counted as unemployed, above and beyond the official ones.

Identifying these marginally attached individuals is important in the MENA region where the market economy and labour market institutions are still developing. In the absence of a nationwide network of employment agencies, clearly identified channels might not exist for the exchange of labour market information. The presence of large rural sectors exacerbates the difficulties. As a result, the distinction between the unemployed and the non-employed becomes blurred.

To render the marginal attachment notion operational, we first examine sub-groups of non-participants who display elevated mobility into employment. Students emerge as a group worthy of distinction between Q2 and Q3.

Next we examine data on search behaviour. We define the marginally attached as individuals who did not search during the reference period, but did so earlier – behaviour that suggests willingness to work.

We then divide non-participants into three groups: students, marginally attached and others. Finally, we examine transition rates between five different labour market states: the three sub-groups of non-participants we identify plus employment and unemployment.

The empirical question is whether the marginally attached can be combined with the unemployed or with non-participants. Our results convincingly separate the marginally attached from the other non-participants. The line of demarcation between the unemployed and the marginally attached is blurred. The upshot is that the marginally attached individuals deserve as much attention as the unemployed.

What our study shows is that the official unemployment rate conceals identifiable segments of the population who are keen to respond to the employment generation capabilities of the labour market.

Our critical assessment should not be mistaken for a proposal to drop the standard definition of unemployment: that definition is a measure that allows useful international comparisons and should be maintained. Rather, our point is that the standard measure may not be adequate for assessing the degree of labour market attachment that is present in a given economy at a given point of time.

By using additional measures of unemployment that relax one or more of the tests used in classifying non-employed individuals, it is possible to obtain alternate measures. Tracking the different measures over time provides a more accurate sense of labour market developments. For a more elaborate example of this approach, we recommend The Employment Situation news release of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the United States.

Further reading

Özkan-Değirmenci, Hayriye Özgül, and İnsan Tunalı (2014) ‘Labor Market Mobility and Marginal Attachment in Turkey: Evidence from HLFS, 2000-2002’.

Most read

Fair competition is needed to empower women economically in the Arab world

The participation rates of women in the labour market in Arab countries are the lowest in the world. This column argues that remedying the under-representation of women in the labour force is a social and economic imperative for the region. There are three dimensions for action to realise the potential of Arab women: amending laws and regulations; instilling fair competition in markets; and promoting the digital economy.

Arab countries are caught in an inequality trap

Conventional wisdom, based mainly on surveyed household income distribution statistics, suggests that inequality is generally low in Arab countries. At the same time, little attention has been devoted to social inequalities, whether in terms of outcomes or opportunities. This column introduces a forthcoming report, which offers a different narrative: based on the largest research project on the subject to date and covering 12 Arab countries, the authors argue that the region is caught in an inequality trap.

Recession without impact: why Lebanese elites delay reform

The survival of Lebanon’s political elites is highly dependent on the wellbeing of the economy. Why then do they delay necessary reform to avoid crisis? This column examines the role of politically connected firms in delaying much-needed economic stabilisation policies.

Competition laws: a key role for economic growth in MENA

Competition policy lacks the attention it deserves in the countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), a region characterised by monopolies and lack of market contestability. As this column explains, there are many questions about the extent of anti-competitive barriers facing new market entrants in the region. What’s more, MENA’s weak overall performance on competition is likely to be hindering economic growth and the path towards structural transformation.

The Egyptian economy is still not creating good jobs

Growth in Egypt has recovered substantially since the downturn following the global financial crisis and the political instability following the 2011 revolution – but what has happened to jobs? This column reports the results on employment conditions from just released data in the 2018 wave of the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey.

How Egyptian households cope with shocks: new evidence

Managing risks and reducing vulnerability to economic, social, environmental and health shocks enhances the wellbeing of households and encourages investment in human capital. This column explores the nature of shocks experienced by Egyptian households as well as the coping mechanisms that they use. It also examines the relationship between such risks and job formality and health status.

The future of Egypt’s population: opportunities and challenges

Egypt’s potential labour supply depends on the growth and changing composition of its working-age population. This column reports the latest data on labour supply and fertility rates, concluding that the country has a window of opportunity with reduced demographic pressures to try to address longstanding structural challenges for the labour market.

Egypt’s labour market: facts and prospects

An ERF policy conference on the Egyptian labour market in late October 2019 focused on gender and economic vulnerability. This column summarises the key takeaways from the event.

An appeal for Sudan’s future

Sudan today is on a knife-edge: it can evolve toward peace and democracy – or spiral into instability and violence. As this Project Syndicate column argues, vital and timely international assistance can make the difference between success and failure for the new government.

Domestic demand and competition: a new development paradigm for MENA

A lack of competition in domestic and regional markets is holding back development in the Middle East and North Africa. This column argues that the region and the international community must ensure that barriers to market entry and exit are eliminated, and that independent regulatory bodies at the national and regional levels help to promote domestic demand as the main engine for sustainable and inclusive growth.