Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Energy subsidy reform: progress and challenges

188
Despite a growing global consensus about the need for reform of costly and environmentally damaging energy price subsidies, many countries remain resistant. This column takes stock of recent developments in the context of a database of diesel prices. Environmental concerns seem to play a role in driving reform, but most reforming countries have been facing large fiscal imbalances.

In a nutshell

The sharp drop in international energy prices provides an opportunity for energy importers to remove their subsidies, while putting pressure on energy exporters to reform their subsidies.

Energy subsidy reforms that are driven by long-term factors, such as environmental concerns, are likely to endure.

Reforms that are mainly driven by fiscal imbalances may not last unless they are accompanied by deeper reform measures.

Energy subsidies are fiscally costly; they crowd out productive public spending; they damage the environment; and they are a highly inefficient way of distributing income. Yet despite their widely recognised negative consequences, energy subsidies have proved difficult to reform in many countries.

But several recent developments have opened up a window of opportunity for reform. Sluggish global growth has put continued fiscal pressure on many economies. The sharp drop in international energy prices since mid-2014 provides a unique opportunity for energy importers to remove their subsidies, while putting pressure on energy exporters to reform their subsidies as energy revenues fall.

The fact that over 190 countries submitted proposals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions for the Paris Agreement on climate change creates an additional impetus for change. And there is a growing consensus on how best to reform energy subsidies in a way that can help to mitigate the social and political impacts.

To take stock of recent developments in energy subsidy reform, we have examined an energy price database for diesel, a fuel that is often the central focus of reform and the prices of which are readily available.

International diesel prices have experienced increased volatility since the end of 2006, with the most recent sharp decline starting around mid-2014. Measures of ‘pass-through’ – the ratio of changes in domestic prices divided by changes in international prices – can help us to understand how countries around the world have responded to changes in international prices.

Pass-through has varied substantially across regions, largely reflecting differences in energy pricing regimes. In the Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan and Pakistan, pass-through has been lower than anywhere else. Many countries in the region administratively set energy prices, often at levels substantially below international prices, and rarely change them much in response to international price movements. Since many countries have not fully passed through the drop in international prices, energy subsidies – that is, the extent to which domestic energy prices are below international supply costs – have declined.

Country-specific experiences provide additional insights on the impetus for energy subsidy reforms. While pass-through measures provide information on the evolution of energy prices, they may mask important developments in energy subsidy reforms. A large number of countries have actively reformed their subsidies since mid-2014 by raising energy prices – in contrast to the passive partial pass-through of falling international prices – and also by introducing automatic pricing mechanisms or by liberalising their energy markets.

Several important themes emerge from the details of the subsidy reforms in these countries. The first is that recent reform efforts have been concentrated in oil-exporting countries, including some that have traditionally been stalwart energy subsidisers. This is mainly driven by declines in oil revenues, which force oil-exporting countries to consider broad fiscal reforms including energy subsidy reform. While some of these exporters initiated small fuel price increases prior to 2014, they have intensified their efforts in response to lower oil prices.

A second theme is that most of the countries that implemented reforms faced large fiscal imbalances. While almost all countries that initiated energy subsidy reform had a fiscal deficit at the start of the reform, fiscal deficits in recent reform countries tend to be particularly larger and more concentrated in oil-exporting countries. This suggests that fiscal imbalances are likely to be one of the main reasons for energy subsidy reform and could have important implications for the durability of reforms.

The third theme is that environmental concerns are an important driver of energy subsidy reform in some countries. This includes countries that recently introduced a carbon tax, raised carbon prices on top of the European Union’s emissions trading system or introduced their own emissions trading systems.

The final theme is that recent reforms tend to be better designed, drawing on lessons from past reforms and best practices. Many of these reforms have built on the key ingredients for successful energy subsidy reform and very few reforms involve only simple, one-time price increases.

A comprehensive communication campaign has been widely adopted as part of the reform strategy; some countries implemented automatic pricing mechanisms or liberalised energy prices to prevent the return of energy subsidies; gradual and phased price increases were adopted by many countries; and many introduced measures to mitigate the impact on the poor, strengthen the social safety net and/or invest in health and education spending. In addition, some oil-exporting countries have considered energy subsidy reform as part of a broader economic reform to reduce their oil dependency.

A key concern is whether subsidies will re-emerge once international prices start to increase. There are some encouraging signs, but questions remain over the extent to which these reforms can be sustained. Not all the declines in international energy prices have been passed through to domestic prices in many developing economies and, as a result, energy subsidies have declined.

Reforms that are driven by long-term factors – such as environmental concerns – are likely to endure since these factors will not disappear in the near future. In addition, many recent reforms have been better designed to address their social and economic impacts and therefore are less likely to be reversed.

On the other hand, reforms that are mainly driven by fiscal imbalances may not last as these conditions are temporary unless they are accompanied by deeper reform measures, such as adoption of an automatic fuel pricing mechanism or even liberalisation.

Authors’ note: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the IMF, its Executive Board, or its management.

A longer version of this summary is available at VoxEU.

Most read

Why the West got rich and the Middle East did not

Today’s rulers of the three largest Middle Eastern economies all look to religious authorities as a key source of legitimacy. Drawing on a broad sweep of historical analysis, this column explores what this might mean for the region’s economic future. One notable danger is that the types of people who would push for policies that promote long-run growth are excluded from the political bargaining table.

Why Turkish growth ended

Following a period of rapid economic growth, the Turkish economy has slowed significantly since 2007. This column argues that these economic ups and downs reflect institutional improvements in the aftermath of the country’s 2001 financial crisis, followed by an ominous slide in the quality of these economic and political institutions.

Implications of the current low oil prices for MENA countries

The current low oil price environment, in part driven by the US shale oil revolution, has important macroeconomic implications for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). This column reports research evidence on its likely impact on both oil-exporting and oil-importing countries in the region.

Prospects for development with democracy in the Arab world

What are the prospects for democracy in the Arab world? This column expresses the hope that as conflict-afflicted countries embark on their programmes of economic reconstruction, autocratic institutions will not be re-established under the pretext of the need for a speedy and steady recovery. The optimal path of development necessarily includes robust growth, equity as well as democracy.

An agenda for reducing income inequality in the Arab countries

What can be done to reduce income inequality in Arab countries? This column explores issues of measurement as well as potential policy measures. It concludes by calling for a new multipurpose pan-Arab survey that would allow for an evidence-based decision-making process on the impact of proposed policies on poverty and inequality.

The United Arab Emirates’ dilemma

As energy-producing economies strive to reduce their reliance on oil revenues, they must strike a balance between the competing demands of fiscal sustainability and steady growth of the non-energy sector. This column outlines how the United Arab Emirates is addressing this challenge.

Freedom for women is crucial for economic progress in MENA

The Middle East was once the cradle of civilisation: can it prosper once again? Looking back at lessons from the European Enlightenment, this column argues that if the region wants to advance economically, it needs to advance in terms of its treatment of women. Female agency is central to understanding the West’s technological leadership of the past two centuries.

Inequality in higher education: Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia

Attainment of higher education is strikingly unequal in Egypt and Tunisia, and a little less so in Jordan. This column reports research showing that in all three countries, family background is the primary driver of inequality. Particularly in Egypt and Tunisia, public spending on higher education is regressive, with the result that what purports to be a meritocratic and equitable system in reality perpetuates inequality.

Oil exporters’ responses to the US fracking boom

What are the implications of low oil prices for the economic and political stability of Arab oil-exporting countries such as Saudi Arabia? This column explores the impact of the US fracking boom on Arab oil revenues – and how policy-makers in these countries should respond.

Pension reform that avoids harming MENA labour markets

To tackle the deficits in their pension systems, should governments in Arab countries raise social security contributions, reduce pension levels or increase the statutory retirement age? This column summarises the results of research assessing the costs and benefits of different pension reforms in terms of their impact on different generations and on the labour market.