Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Making aid-for-trade more effective in the MENA region

1267
Aid-for-trade represents an important opportunity for developing countries to enhance their trade capacities. But the positive effect of aid-for-trade on exports can hinge on the quality of institutions in recipient countries. According to research reported in this column, in the Middle East and North Africa, it is specific aid types – such as aid to support trade policy reform and aid to enhance productive capacities – that matter most for exports.

In a nutshell

Aid-for-trade increases both the probability of exporting and the volume of bilateral exports by recipient countries; but the difference in the quality of institutions between recipient and donor countries dampens the positive effect of aid-for-trade on exports.
Given the positive impact of aid-for-trade on the exports of recipient countries, donors should consider increasing the amount of disbursed assistance of this kind, especially in regions that have not historically benefited from large aid inflows.

Since institutions in recipient countries influence the efficacy of aid-for-trade, tying the amount of aid disbursed by donors to reforms undertaken in recipients to strengthen the quality of their institutions would be advisable.

Following the World Trade Organization’s launch of the ‘Aid-for-Trade Initiative’ in 2005, donor countries started funnelling larger volumes of ‘official development assistance’ that aim to enhance the trade capacities of recipient countries.

The MENA region has benefited from aid-for-trade (AfT) inflows since 2002, before such assistance was officially labelled as AfT. Between 2002 and 2019, MENA countries received AfT amounting to US$20 billion on average each year. Moreover, the AfT flowing to them represented around 13% of total disbursed AfT over that period.

Many countries in the region pursued parallel reforms aimed at adopting less restrictive trade policies and opening up their markets to foreign investments. But while AfT can have important positive effects on the region’s development prospects, weak institutions can undermine the outcome.

AfT can be divided into three categories: aid to develop economic infrastructure, aid to enhance productive capacities, and aid to support trade policy reform:

  • The first category includes aid flows targeting infrastructure such as transport and storage, communications, energy, in addition to banking and financial services.
  • The second category groups all flows related to economic sectors including agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry and mining.
  • The third category includes all flows pertaining to trade policy administrative management, trade facilitation, enhancing regional trade agreements and multilateral negotiations, and trade-related adjustments.

In new research, we show that AfT for trade policy comes first in terms of its impact on recipients’ exports (Aboushady et al, 2024). Given its role in promoting trade facilitation, supporting trade-related negotiations and streamlining trade policy, this result comes as no surprise.

By and large, we also find that AfT flows targeting productive capacities are particularly relevant for stimulating the value of exports, whereas AfT flows targeting economic infrastructure are especially important for increasing the probability of exports.

These findings hold for the MENA region and are also true for most of the other regions in the sample. Remarkably, among all the sample regions, the impact of AfT on export volumes is the largest in MENA, while its effect on the likelihood of exporting is the second-largest in MENA.

But we also argue that the effectiveness of AfT depends on the quality of institutions and policies in recipient countries. While poor domestic policies create distortions that would reduce the efficacy of aid through unproductive use, good governance conditions can enhance the effectiveness of aid by minimising the risk of aid diversion and capture by elites.

Our key findings show that the effect of AfT on exports is overall positive but decreasing with the institutional distance between aid recipients and donors: the larger the distance (that is, the lower the quality of institutions in recipient countries), the smaller the effect of AfT on exports.

Implications for policy

A number of policy recommendations stem from our research.

First, given the important role of institutions, recipient countries would further enhance the benefits of AfT if they improve their governance quality and reduce the institutional gap relative to donor countries. This is particularly relevant for MENA countries, in view of their comparatively weak institutions and in light of our findings on the large impact of AfT on their exports.

Second, in light of the positive contribution of AfT to the expansion of both the prospects of trade and the trade volume in aid-recipient countries, donors should consider increasing the amount of disbursed AfT, especially in regions that did not historically benefit from large aid inflows.

Lastly, since institutions in aid-recipient countries influence the efficacy of AfT, tying the amount of aid disbursed by donors to reforms undertaken in recipients to strengthen the quality of their institutions would be advisable.

Further reading

Aboushady, Nora, Georges Harb and Chahir Zaki (2024) ‘Aid for trade and export performance of recipient countries: the moderating role of institutions’, The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 1-29.

Gnangnon, S-K (2019) ‘Aid for trade and export diversification in recipient-countries’, The World Economy 42(2): 396-418.

Lee, Y, and J Oh (2022) ‘Is aid for trade working? Evidence from Southeast Asian countries’, Asia Pacific Management Review 27(2): 137-44.

Lemi, A (2017) ‘Aid for trade and Africa’s trade performance: Evidence from bilateral trade flows with China and OECD countries’, Journal of African Trade 4: 37-60.

Nishitateno, S, and H Umetani (2023) ‘Heterogeneous effects of aid for trade on donor exports: why is Japan different?’, Review of International Economics 31(3): 1117-45.

Tags: , , , ,

  • Nora Aboushady
    Nora Aboushady
    Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University
  • Georges Harb
    Georges Harb
    Associate Professor of Economics, Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University (LAU)
  • Chahir Zaki
    Chahir Zaki
    Chaired Professor of Economics, University of Orléans

Most read

Adoption of decentralised solar energy: lessons from Palestinian households

The experience of Palestinian households offers a compelling case study of behavioural adaptation to energy poverty via solar water heater adoption. This column highlights the key barriers to solar energy adoption in terms of both the socio-economic status and dwellings of potential users. Policy-makers need to address these barriers to ensure a just and equitable transition, particularly for households in conflict-affected areas across the MENA region.

Migration, human capital and labour markets in MENA

Migration is a longstanding and integral part of the MENA region’s economic and social fabric, with profound implications for labour markets and human capital development. To harness the potential of migration for promoting economic and social development, policy-makers must aim to deliver mutual benefits for origin countries, host countries and migrants. Such a triple-win strategy requires better data, investment in return migration, skill partnerships, reduced remittance costs and sustained support for host countries.

Shifting gears: how the private sector can be an engine of growth in MENA

Businesses are a key source of productivity growth, innovation and jobs. But in the Middle East and North Africa, the private sector is not dynamic and the region has a long history of low growth. This column summarises a new report explaining how a brighter future for MENA’s private sector is within reach if governments rethink their role and firms harness talent effectively.

Building net-zero futures: Asian lessons for MENA’s construction sector

Three big economies in Asia are achieving carbon neutrality in construction. This column draws lessons from Japan, Taiwan and Thailand – and explains why, given the vast solar potential and growing focus on environmental, social and governance matters in the Middle East and North Africa, governments in the region must adopt similarly ambitious policies and partnerships.

Losing the key to joy: how oil rents undermine patience and economic growth

How does reliance on oil revenues shape economic behaviour worldwide? This column reports new research showing that oil rents weaken governance, eroding patience – a key driver of economic growth and, according to the 13th century Persian poet Rumi, ‘the key to joy’. Policy measures to counter the damage include enhancing transparency in oil revenue management, strengthening independent oversight institutions and ensuring that sovereign wealth funds have robust rules of governance.

Artificial intelligence and the future of employment in MENA

Artificial intelligence offers opportunities for boosting productivity and innovation. But it also poses substantial threats to traditional employment structures, particularly in economies like those in the Middle East and North Africa that are reliant on low-skill or routine labour. This column explores how AI is likely to affect employment across the region and proposes policy directions for governments to harness AI for inclusive and sustainable economic growth.

Freedom, agency and material conditions: human development in MENA

Conventional approaches to measuring human development, which are primarily centred on income, health and education, provide an incomplete assessment of people’s opportunities to improve their lives. As this column explains, it is essential to understand how institutional and social environments influence individuals’ agency over their development outcomes. Analysis of the diverse recent experiences of Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia illustrates how such an approach can inform policy-making.

Fiscal limits and debt sustainability in MENA economies

Public debt is piling up across the Middle East and North Africa after years of political upheavals, economic shocks and the Covid-19 pandemic. With fiscal space shrinking, governments are under pressure to act. This column explains why for many countries in the region, the room for manoeuvre on the public finances may be smaller than policy-makers think. Urgent action is needed to restore debt sustainability.

Market integration in the Middle East and the Balkans, 1560-1914

Trade has re-emerged as a central issue in global policy debates, as governments debate not only the costs and benefits of trade, but also the underlying determinants of market integration. To inform the discussion, this column reports new research evidence on the experiences of the former Ottoman territories in the Middle East and the Balkans over nearly four centuries, tracing the evolution, drivers and consequences of trade integration across these regions.

From rentier states to innovation economies: is a MENA transition possible?

The combination of climate change, energy price volatility, high unemployment among educated youth, and global technological competition is exposing the vulnerabilities of MENA’s traditional economic structures and the need for structural transformation. This column examines whether such a transition is feasible and the policies that could promote such a shift.