Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Making aid-for-trade more effective in the MENA region

1627
Aid-for-trade represents an important opportunity for developing countries to enhance their trade capacities. But the positive effect of aid-for-trade on exports can hinge on the quality of institutions in recipient countries. According to research reported in this column, in the Middle East and North Africa, it is specific aid types – such as aid to support trade policy reform and aid to enhance productive capacities – that matter most for exports.

In a nutshell

Aid-for-trade increases both the probability of exporting and the volume of bilateral exports by recipient countries; but the difference in the quality of institutions between recipient and donor countries dampens the positive effect of aid-for-trade on exports.
Given the positive impact of aid-for-trade on the exports of recipient countries, donors should consider increasing the amount of disbursed assistance of this kind, especially in regions that have not historically benefited from large aid inflows.

Since institutions in recipient countries influence the efficacy of aid-for-trade, tying the amount of aid disbursed by donors to reforms undertaken in recipients to strengthen the quality of their institutions would be advisable.

Following the World Trade Organization’s launch of the ‘Aid-for-Trade Initiative’ in 2005, donor countries started funnelling larger volumes of ‘official development assistance’ that aim to enhance the trade capacities of recipient countries.

The MENA region has benefited from aid-for-trade (AfT) inflows since 2002, before such assistance was officially labelled as AfT. Between 2002 and 2019, MENA countries received AfT amounting to US$20 billion on average each year. Moreover, the AfT flowing to them represented around 13% of total disbursed AfT over that period.

Many countries in the region pursued parallel reforms aimed at adopting less restrictive trade policies and opening up their markets to foreign investments. But while AfT can have important positive effects on the region’s development prospects, weak institutions can undermine the outcome.

AfT can be divided into three categories: aid to develop economic infrastructure, aid to enhance productive capacities, and aid to support trade policy reform:

  • The first category includes aid flows targeting infrastructure such as transport and storage, communications, energy, in addition to banking and financial services.
  • The second category groups all flows related to economic sectors including agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry and mining.
  • The third category includes all flows pertaining to trade policy administrative management, trade facilitation, enhancing regional trade agreements and multilateral negotiations, and trade-related adjustments.

In new research, we show that AfT for trade policy comes first in terms of its impact on recipients’ exports (Aboushady et al, 2024). Given its role in promoting trade facilitation, supporting trade-related negotiations and streamlining trade policy, this result comes as no surprise.

By and large, we also find that AfT flows targeting productive capacities are particularly relevant for stimulating the value of exports, whereas AfT flows targeting economic infrastructure are especially important for increasing the probability of exports.

These findings hold for the MENA region and are also true for most of the other regions in the sample. Remarkably, among all the sample regions, the impact of AfT on export volumes is the largest in MENA, while its effect on the likelihood of exporting is the second-largest in MENA.

But we also argue that the effectiveness of AfT depends on the quality of institutions and policies in recipient countries. While poor domestic policies create distortions that would reduce the efficacy of aid through unproductive use, good governance conditions can enhance the effectiveness of aid by minimising the risk of aid diversion and capture by elites.

Our key findings show that the effect of AfT on exports is overall positive but decreasing with the institutional distance between aid recipients and donors: the larger the distance (that is, the lower the quality of institutions in recipient countries), the smaller the effect of AfT on exports.

Implications for policy

A number of policy recommendations stem from our research.

First, given the important role of institutions, recipient countries would further enhance the benefits of AfT if they improve their governance quality and reduce the institutional gap relative to donor countries. This is particularly relevant for MENA countries, in view of their comparatively weak institutions and in light of our findings on the large impact of AfT on their exports.

Second, in light of the positive contribution of AfT to the expansion of both the prospects of trade and the trade volume in aid-recipient countries, donors should consider increasing the amount of disbursed AfT, especially in regions that did not historically benefit from large aid inflows.

Lastly, since institutions in aid-recipient countries influence the efficacy of AfT, tying the amount of aid disbursed by donors to reforms undertaken in recipients to strengthen the quality of their institutions would be advisable.

Further reading

Aboushady, Nora, Georges Harb and Chahir Zaki (2024) ‘Aid for trade and export performance of recipient countries: the moderating role of institutions’, The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 1-29.

Gnangnon, S-K (2019) ‘Aid for trade and export diversification in recipient-countries’, The World Economy 42(2): 396-418.

Lee, Y, and J Oh (2022) ‘Is aid for trade working? Evidence from Southeast Asian countries’, Asia Pacific Management Review 27(2): 137-44.

Lemi, A (2017) ‘Aid for trade and Africa’s trade performance: Evidence from bilateral trade flows with China and OECD countries’, Journal of African Trade 4: 37-60.

Nishitateno, S, and H Umetani (2023) ‘Heterogeneous effects of aid for trade on donor exports: why is Japan different?’, Review of International Economics 31(3): 1117-45.

Tags: , , , ,

  • Nora Aboushady
    Nora Aboushady
    Associate Professor, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University
  • Georges Harb
    Georges Harb
    Associate Professor of Economics, Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University (LAU)
  • Chahir Zaki
    Chahir Zaki
    Chaired Professor of Economics, University of Orléans

Most read

Sanctions and the shrinking size of Iran’s middle class

International sanctions imposed on Iran from 2012 have reduced the size of the country’s middle class, according to new research summarised in this column. The findings highlight the profound social consequences of economic pressure, not least given the crucial role of that segment of society for national innovation, growth and stability. The study underscores the need for policies to safeguard the civilian population in countries targeted by sanctions.

Artificial intelligence and the renewable energy transition in MENA

Artificial intelligence has the potential to bridge the gap between abundant natural resources and the pressing need for reliable, sustainable power in the Middle East and North Africa. This column outlines the constraints and proposes policies that can address the challenges of variability of renewable resources and stress on power grids, and support the transformation of ‘sunlight’ to ‘smart power’.

Green jobs for MENA in the age of AI: crafting a sustainable labour market

Arab economies face a dual transformation: the decarbonisation imperative driven by climate change; and the rapid digitalisation brought by artificial intelligence. This column argues that by strategically managing the green-AI nexus, policy-makers in the region can position their countries not merely as followers adapting to global mandates but as leaders in sustainable innovation.

Egypt’s forgotten democratisation: a challenge to modern myths about MENA

A widely held narrative asserts that countries in the Middle East are inevitably authoritarian. This column reports new research that tracks Egyptian parliamentarians since 1824 to reveal that the region’s struggle with democracy is not in fact about cultural incompatibility: it’s about colonialism disrupting home-grown democratic movements and elite conflicts being resolved through disenfranchisement rather than power-sharing.

MENA integration into global value chains and sustainable development

Despite the geopolitical advantages, abundant natural resources and young populations of many countries in the Middle East and North Africa, they remain on the periphery of global value chains, the international networks of production and service activities that now dominate the world economy. This column explains the positive impact of integration into GVCs on exports and employment; its role in technology transfer and capacity upgrading; and the structural barriers that constrain the region’s involvement. Greater GVC participation can help to deliver structural transformation and sustainable development.

Arab youth and the future of work

The Arab region’s labour markets are undergoing a triple transformation: demographic, digital and green. As this column explains, whether these forces evolve into engines of opportunity or drivers of exclusion for young people will hinge on how swiftly and coherently policy-makers can align education, technology and employment systems to foster adaptive skills, inclusive institutions and innovation-led pathways to decent work.

Wrong finance in a broken multilateral system: red flags from COP30-Belém

With the latest global summit on climate action recently wrapped up, ambitious COP pledges and initiatives continue to miss delivery due to inadequate commitments, weak operationalisation and unclear reporting systems. As this column reports, flows of climate finance remain skewed: loans over grants; climate mitigation more than climate adaptation; and weak accountability across mechanisms. Without grant-based finance, debt relief, climate-adjusted lending and predictable multilateral flows, implementation of promises will fail.

Why political connections are driving business confidence in MENA

This column reports the findings of a new study of how the political ties of firms in the Middle East and North Africa boost business confidence. The research suggests that this optimism is primarily driven by networked access to credit and lobbying, underscoring the need for greater transparency and institutional reform in corporate governance.

Digitalising governance in MENA: opportunities for social justice

Can digital governance promote social justice in MENA – or does it risk deepening inequality and exclusion? This column examines the evolution of digital governance in three sub-regions – Egypt, Jordan and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council – highlighting how data practices, transparency mechanisms and citizen trust shape the social outcomes of technological reform.