Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Solving both the short- and long-term Covid-19 crises

1147
The global health and economic crisis compels us to act in the short term. But as this Brookings column argues, we also need to look at longer-term challenges. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals provide a pathway for us to ‘build back better’ after Covid-19.

In a nutshell

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) urge us to address challenges in poverty, health, inequality and many other areas, while vowing to leave no one behind, with a deadline of 2030.

Many of the SDGs both address the current crisis as well as longer-term needs, including: good health and wellbeing; water and sanitation; ending hunger; decent work and economic growth; and quality education.

This crisis has shown us the enormous economic and human costs of ignoring our own best advice to stave off the next crisis – this time, let’s do the right thing and deliver.

The global Covid-19 health and economic crisis compels us to act in the short term – in the here and now. We can’t look away from the human health consequences without giving our best efforts to lessen the suffering of those infected.

On the economic side, there is also great pain that must be assuaged. Some people are even using the ‘D-Word‘ to describe our unique predicament, with no widely agreed solutions, and central bankers feeling the need to reassure markets that they are not running low on ammunition.

Multilateral organisations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have abruptly retooled and turned their focus completely towards this new global challenge, making sweeping changes in their agenda, engineering relief from debt service and making substantial new investments in disaster response.

The IMF estimates the total fiscal crisis relief is now at $8 trillion. The United Nations is also urging debt relief, while organising a coordinated response and sending technical and material assistance to dozens of countries. The European Union is stepping up with a large stimulus bill. Even a divided US Congress agreed to spend $2 trillion for its crisis response.

However, poor nations, including those not yet experiencing high infection rates, will find it much more difficult to find the resources to climb out of this predicament. Low- and middle-income nations will benefit from multilateral assistance, but as infection rates rise, these nations may be disproportionately affected since 93% of the world’s informal employment is in emerging and developing countries.

Helping these workers may require novel approaches, such as cash transfers, which have been used with success in other crisis situations, while some nations are offering tax relief to spur business activity, and others recommend wage subsidies and adjustments to credit guarantees and loan terms.

Of course, we have no choice but to act. Yet what happens when the crisis is over? There is likely to be another Cassandra-like report which foreshadows the next crisis, begging our future selves to act in our own self-interest and to invest in solutions to problems that will confront us soon enough. Yet we rarely act to forestall or lessen the next crisis.

It’s not like we haven’t seen (a milder version of) this movie before: 15 years ago after SARS; and five years ago after the Ebola outbreak. Both times we diverted our attention just long enough to deal with the immediate needs, and then ignored the careful high-level post-mortem reports that laid out key decision-making and investments that would help us respond to potentially much bigger challenges in the future like Covid-19.

Yet, buried in those not quite dusty post-mortem reports is a guidebook that shows us the way to serve both our short-term and long-term needs: to invest in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The 17 SDGs provide a pathway for us to ‘build back better‘ after the Covid-19 crisis, according to UN Secretary-General António Guterres. These global goals urge us to address challenges in poverty, health, inequality and many other areas, while vowing to leave no one behind, with a deadline of 2030.

Many of the SDGs both address the current crisis as well as longer-term needs, including:

 

Good health and wellbeing (SDG3)

Right now the World Health Organization and other partners are supporting government Covid-19 responses, including testing, isolating and caring for confirmed cases, while also tracing and quarantining people who have come in close contact with the infected.

Over the long term, each country needs a health system that can deliver quality, essential healthcare and preventative services to everyone. They also need the capacity to perform future disease surveillance and diagnosis rapidly to identify, treat and contain outbreaks, so that the human and economic costs are lessened.

 

Water and sanitation (SDG6)

To slow down the transmission of Covid-19, people need to wash or sanitise their hands. Yet today three billion people do not have access to even basic handwashing facilities at home, largely because they lack access to clean water, which increases their vulnerability to disease and ill health.

Longer term, we must achieve universal access to safe and affordable drinking water and adequate sanitation for all in order to slow down the spread of infection and improve the health of all people.

 

Ending hunger (SDG2)

In many parts of the developing world, school closures mean the loss of children’s meals. In addition, global supply chains and trade have been disrupted, not just for food, but for agriculture inputs that support food production, exacerbated by the substantial number of workers idled due to Covid-19.

Now is the time to act for long-term food security by making investments in technology that can improve agriculture productivity and the incomes of small-scale farmers.

 

Decent work and economic growth (SDG8)

According to the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Covid-19 crisis is expected to wipe out 6.7% of working hours globally in the second quarter of 2020 – equivalent to 195 million full-time workers. The ILO and others are urging that countries offer at least a basic level of social protection to as many people as possible, as soon as possible.

Longer term, countries need to make investments to sustain per capita economic growth, productivity and entrepreneurship, to support formalisation and growth of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, including through access to financial services.

 

Quality education (SDG4)

According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Covid-19 has forced an estimated 1.5 billion learners to stay at home. UNESCO is supporting governments for distance learning, scientific cooperation, and information support.

Longer-term support means that we need to make sure all children – especially girls – are in school and reaching literacy and numeracy targets, and are given greater access to secondary and tertiary education, as well as vocational training, while all should be served by well-trained teachers.

These are just a handful of examples of a comprehensive and applicable framework to enable us to achieve these goals while fighting poverty in an inclusive and sustainable way. Yet these Covid-related SDGs require adequate financing to respond to the crisis and also to make investments that can help us to become resilient to the ever-present threats.

This crisis has shown us the enormous economic and human costs of ignoring our own best advice to stave off the next crisis. This time, let’s do the right thing and deliver.

 

This column was first published by Brookings – see the original version here.

Most read

Sanctions and the shrinking size of Iran’s middle class

International sanctions imposed on Iran from 2012 have reduced the size of the country’s middle class, according to new research summarised in this column. The findings highlight the profound social consequences of economic pressure, not least given the crucial role of that segment of society for national innovation, growth and stability. The study underscores the need for policies to safeguard the civilian population in countries targeted by sanctions.

Artificial intelligence and the renewable energy transition in MENA

Artificial intelligence has the potential to bridge the gap between abundant natural resources and the pressing need for reliable, sustainable power in the Middle East and North Africa. This column outlines the constraints and proposes policies that can address the challenges of variability of renewable resources and stress on power grids, and support the transformation of ‘sunlight’ to ‘smart power’.

Green jobs for MENA in the age of AI: crafting a sustainable labour market

Arab economies face a dual transformation: the decarbonisation imperative driven by climate change; and the rapid digitalisation brought by artificial intelligence. This column argues that by strategically managing the green-AI nexus, policy-makers in the region can position their countries not merely as followers adapting to global mandates but as leaders in sustainable innovation.

Egypt’s forgotten democratisation: a challenge to modern myths about MENA

A widely held narrative asserts that countries in the Middle East are inevitably authoritarian. This column reports new research that tracks Egyptian parliamentarians since 1824 to reveal that the region’s struggle with democracy is not in fact about cultural incompatibility: it’s about colonialism disrupting home-grown democratic movements and elite conflicts being resolved through disenfranchisement rather than power-sharing.

MENA integration into global value chains and sustainable development

Despite the geopolitical advantages, abundant natural resources and young populations of many countries in the Middle East and North Africa, they remain on the periphery of global value chains, the international networks of production and service activities that now dominate the world economy. This column explains the positive impact of integration into GVCs on exports and employment; its role in technology transfer and capacity upgrading; and the structural barriers that constrain the region’s involvement. Greater GVC participation can help to deliver structural transformation and sustainable development.

Arab youth and the future of work

The Arab region’s labour markets are undergoing a triple transformation: demographic, digital and green. As this column explains, whether these forces evolve into engines of opportunity or drivers of exclusion for young people will hinge on how swiftly and coherently policy-makers can align education, technology and employment systems to foster adaptive skills, inclusive institutions and innovation-led pathways to decent work.

Wrong finance in a broken multilateral system: red flags from COP30-Belém

With the latest global summit on climate action recently wrapped up, ambitious COP pledges and initiatives continue to miss delivery due to inadequate commitments, weak operationalisation and unclear reporting systems. As this column reports, flows of climate finance remain skewed: loans over grants; climate mitigation more than climate adaptation; and weak accountability across mechanisms. Without grant-based finance, debt relief, climate-adjusted lending and predictable multilateral flows, implementation of promises will fail.

Why political connections are driving business confidence in MENA

This column reports the findings of a new study of how the political ties of firms in the Middle East and North Africa boost business confidence. The research suggests that this optimism is primarily driven by networked access to credit and lobbying, underscoring the need for greater transparency and institutional reform in corporate governance.

Digitalising governance in MENA: opportunities for social justice

Can digital governance promote social justice in MENA – or does it risk deepening inequality and exclusion? This column examines the evolution of digital governance in three sub-regions – Egypt, Jordan and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council – highlighting how data practices, transparency mechanisms and citizen trust shape the social outcomes of technological reform.