Economic Research Forum (ERF)

The benefits of year-round daylight saving time: evidence from Turkey

38
Ever since Benjamin Franklin’s observation in the late eighteenth century that people wasted daylight by sleeping after sunrise and squandered wax by burning candles in the evening, energy conservation has been the main motivation for governments to follow ‘daylight saving time’ (DST). Using Turkey’s recent decision to extend DST to the whole year, this column summarises new evidence on how DST affects the consumption and generation of electricity, and related greenhouse gas emissions. The analysis suggests that while total consumption is unchanged, emissions may have gone down due to the policy change.

In a nutshell

After Turkey stopped turning back its clocks to standard time in October 2016, there has been neither an increase nor a decrease in the country’s energy consumption.

But there has been a strong intra-day redistributional effect of staying on daylight saving time all year round: while electricity consumption increases considerably in the morning, it decreases in the late afternoon and early evening.

The change in the intra-day distribution affects the fuel mix used for electricity generation, reducing the amount of electricity provided by coal- and gas-fired plants, and increasing electricity generation from renewable sources.

More than 70 countries follow daylight saving time (DST) in at least part of the country as a way to promote energy conservation and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (Kellogg and Wolff, 2008; Choi et al, 2017). Moving the clock forward by one hour in the summer months (and reverting back to standard time in the winter months) creates an additional hour of daylight in the afternoon, which may shift people’s daily routine and hence reduce the demand for electricity (Aries and Newham, 2008).

While DST is widely used, it remains a subject of considerable controversy. The European Parliament, for example, recently called on the European Commission to conduct a thorough reassessment of the union-wide summer-time arrangement (Stearns, 2018).

Empirical research on this topic remains inconclusive about whether DST policy is an effective tool to reduce electricity consumption. For example, Belzer et al (2008) analyse the impact of a DST extension on national energy consumption in the United States: they estimate total electricity savings of about 0.5% per day of extended DST.

Similarly, studying the effect of DST on electricity consumption in southern Norway and Sweden, Mirza and Bergland (2011) find a 1% fall in annual energy demand for both countries.

In contrast, using a natural experiment in Indiana between 2004 and 2006 and data on household-level monthly consumption for over 200,000 residences, Kotchen and Grant (2011) find an overall increase in residential electricity use by about 1% due to DST. Other studies find a negligible effect of DST because evening reduction in demand for electricity is offset by increased electricity use in the morning (Kellogg and Wolff, 2008; Choi et al, 2017).

In a new study (Aksoy et al, 2019), we contribute to the body of evidence on DST policy and energy consumption by using a novel source of variation from Turkey. Having used DST continuously since the early 1980s, Turkey stopped turning back its clocks to standard time in October 2016 with the intention of making more use of daylight, effectively staying on DST all year round.

The exogenous change in the use of DST allows us to compare entire periods where winter time was implemented (November 2015 to March 2016) with those where it would have been applied if the policy change had not happened (October 2016 to March 2017).

In particular, we exploit the variation in energy consumption before and after the policy change as well as between hours affected and unaffected by DST to identify the impact of DST on hourly energy demand, using the analytical technique known as ‘difference-in-differences’.

We find that, overall, the policy change neither increases nor decreases energy consumption. But the results show that there is a strong intra-day redistributional effect of keeping summer time all year round: while electricity consumption increases considerably in the morning, it decreases in the late afternoon and early evening.

Besides having novel hourly data on electricity usage across the country, which covers both residential and industrial consumption, we collect information on sources of electricity production and average emission factors by fuel type for the Turkish electricity market.

Some studies have offered rough estimates for the environmental impact of DST by multiplying the estimated change in overall electricity consumption with emission rates of energy sources employed in the relevant electricity grid (Hill et al, 2010; Kotchen and Grant, 2011).

In contrast, we use the difference-in-differences technique to test directly how the one hour time shift influences electricity generation and social costs of emissions due to changes in the electricity load.

We find that the change in the intra-day load curve in turn affects the fuel mix used for electricity generation. In particular, the policy change significantly reduces the amount of electricity provided by coal- and gas-fired plants, especially during early morning hours. At the same time, electricity generation from renewable sources, such as hydro power, significantly increases.

This leads to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of about 36,560 tons per day. Hence, while the overall impact of the policy change on electricity use is negligible, it has important positive impacts on the distribution of the electricity load and therefore on Turkey’s electricity generation and greenhouse gas emissions.

Further reading

Aksoy, Cevat Giray, Çağatay Bircan and Elisa Wirsching (2019) ‘Daylight Saving All Year Round: Evidence from the Turkish Experiment’, mimeo.

Aries, Myriam, and Guy Newham (2008) ‘Effect of Daylight Saving Time on Lighting Energy Use: A Literature Review’, Energy Policy 36: 1858-66.

Belzer, David, Stanton Hadley and Shih-Miao Chin (2008) Impact of Extended Daylight Saving Time on National Energy Consumption, US Department of Energy.

Choi, Seungmoon, Alistair Pellen and Virginie Masson (2017) ‘How does Daylight Saving Time Affect Electricity Demand? An Answer Using Aggregate Data from a Natural Experiment in Western Australia’, Energy Economics 66: 247-60.

Franklin, Benjamin (1784) An Economical Project, Journal de Paris.

Hill, S, F Desobry, E Garnsey and Y-F Chong (2017) ‘The Impact on Energy Consumption of Daylight Saving Clock Changes’, Energy Policy 38(9): 247-60.

Kellogg, Ryan, and Hendrik Wolff (20008) ‘Daylight Time and Energy: Evidence from an Australian Experiment’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56: 207-20.

Kotchen, Matthew, and Laura Grant (2011) ‘Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana’, Review of Economics and Statistics 93(4): 1172-85.

Mirza, Faisal, and Olvar Bergland (2001) ‘The Impact of Daylight Saving Time on Electricity Consumption: Evidence from Southern Norway and Sweden’, Energy Policy 39: 3558-71.

Stearns, Jonathan (2018) ‘Now Brussels Wants to Take Away Your Summer Time’, Bloomberg, 8 February.

Most read

Why the West got rich and the Middle East did not

Today’s rulers of the three largest Middle Eastern economies all look to religious authorities as a key source of legitimacy. Drawing on a broad sweep of historical analysis, this column explores what this might mean for the region’s economic future. One notable danger is that the types of people who would push for policies that promote long-run growth are excluded from the political bargaining table.

Why Turkish growth ended

Following a period of rapid economic growth, the Turkish economy has slowed significantly since 2007. This column argues that these economic ups and downs reflect institutional improvements in the aftermath of the country’s 2001 financial crisis, followed by an ominous slide in the quality of these economic and political institutions.

Implications of the current low oil prices for MENA countries

The current low oil price environment, in part driven by the US shale oil revolution, has important macroeconomic implications for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). This column reports research evidence on its likely impact on both oil-exporting and oil-importing countries in the region.

Prospects for development with democracy in the Arab world

What are the prospects for democracy in the Arab world? This column expresses the hope that as conflict-afflicted countries embark on their programmes of economic reconstruction, autocratic institutions will not be re-established under the pretext of the need for a speedy and steady recovery. The optimal path of development necessarily includes robust growth, equity as well as democracy.

An agenda for reducing income inequality in the Arab countries

What can be done to reduce income inequality in Arab countries? This column explores issues of measurement as well as potential policy measures. It concludes by calling for a new multipurpose pan-Arab survey that would allow for an evidence-based decision-making process on the impact of proposed policies on poverty and inequality.

The United Arab Emirates’ dilemma

As energy-producing economies strive to reduce their reliance on oil revenues, they must strike a balance between the competing demands of fiscal sustainability and steady growth of the non-energy sector. This column outlines how the United Arab Emirates is addressing this challenge.

Freedom for women is crucial for economic progress in MENA

The Middle East was once the cradle of civilisation: can it prosper once again? Looking back at lessons from the European Enlightenment, this column argues that if the region wants to advance economically, it needs to advance in terms of its treatment of women. Female agency is central to understanding the West’s technological leadership of the past two centuries.

Inequality in higher education: Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia

Attainment of higher education is strikingly unequal in Egypt and Tunisia, and a little less so in Jordan. This column reports research showing that in all three countries, family background is the primary driver of inequality. Particularly in Egypt and Tunisia, public spending on higher education is regressive, with the result that what purports to be a meritocratic and equitable system in reality perpetuates inequality.

Pension reform that avoids harming MENA labour markets

To tackle the deficits in their pension systems, should governments in Arab countries raise social security contributions, reduce pension levels or increase the statutory retirement age? This column summarises the results of research assessing the costs and benefits of different pension reforms in terms of their impact on different generations and on the labour market.

Oil exporters’ responses to the US fracking boom

What are the implications of low oil prices for the economic and political stability of Arab oil-exporting countries such as Saudi Arabia? This column explores the impact of the US fracking boom on Arab oil revenues – and how policy-makers in these countries should respond.