Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Fiscal policy in the GCC countries: towards ensuring sustainability

The countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) are all seeking to promote diversification of their economies away from continued dependence on the energy sector, yet oil prices remain the main driver of economic growth in the region. This column discusses how the GCC countries should respond to the ‘new normal’ of ‘low for long’ oil prices, with a goal of supporting growth while ensuring fiscal sustainability and macroeconomic stability.

In a nutshell

All the GCC countries have undertaken significant fiscal reforms to adjust to the ‘new normal’ of oil prices, to reduce their dependence on oil revenues and to sustain the momentum of growth of the non-energy sectors of their economies.

Fiscal sustainability requires careful management of public finances and diversifying sources of financing, in coordination with monetary policy, to ensure debt sustainability and continue the course of economic diversification and higher non-energy growth.

Fiscal management should be budgeted on the basis of a realistic breakeven oil price, with clear contingency plans to safeguard priority spending in the face of oil price volatility and to diversify sources of financing to ensure higher growth and fiscal sustainability.

Over the past decade, the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have enjoyed large external and fiscal surpluses as well as rapid economic expansion on the back of booming oil prices. But with oil prices plunging in recent years, external and fiscal surpluses have turned into deficits and growth has slowed, raising concerns about fiscal sustainability and its implications for macroeconomic stability.

Despite the long-range economic and social development ‎strategies adopted by all GCC countries to promote sustainable ‎development in the non-hydrocarbon sector, oil prices remain the main driver of economic growth in the region. The hydrocarbon sector continues to account for over a half of real economic output, and over 70% of budget revenues and export earnings in most of those countries.

The oil price shock propagates into the macroeconomy through a decline in government spending and slower growth of monetary aggregates, liquidity, deposits and credit, adding further challenges to the diversification strategies of oil-dependent economies.

Adjusting to the ‘new normal’ of oil prices

In an effort to sustain the move of economic activity away from oil, all GCC countries have undertaken significant fiscal reforms since 2015. These include subsidy cuts and lower public spending.

The GCC countries are also continuing fiscal adjustments through mobilisation of additional non-oil revenues, especially the implementation of a value-added tax (VAT) at a rate of 5% in the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia since January 2018, to support government budgets. The pace of fiscal consolidation has been too fast in some cases, at the cost of slowing down non-energy growth and plans for further economic diversification.

Nevertheless, as the medium-term horizon looks more challenging for the oil market, GCC governments need to strike the right balance between the short-term priorities of containing the budget deficit and ensuring fiscal sustainability, and medium-term objectives of ensuring adequate government spending on priorities to support non-energy growth towards achieving further diversification of the economy.

Sustaining diversification efforts requires that GCC governments continue to play a leading role in fostering confidence and prioritising spending in support of further development and private non-energy growth. To that end, priorities for fiscal reforms should be established to increase the efficiency of government spending and safeguard valuable resources for priority spending on development and infrastructure.

In parallel, and to avoid potential crowding out of private activity, diversification of sources of financing is necessary to reduce dependence on domestic financing, particularly from the banking sector, and drawing down government deposits with negative effects on available liquidity for private sector lending.

Diversifying sources of financing

To achieve their visions, the GCC countries could mobilise other sources of financing, such as using existing financial buffers accumulated during periods of high oil prices, and issuing more domestic and foreign debt.

But even if government debt stocks remain low by international standards, a persistent fiscal deficit, coupled with a shrinking surplus or a larger deficit of the external current account as a percentage of GDP, could cause a rapid rise in debt stocks in the short run. This might jeopardise fiscal sustainability and macroeconomic stability.

Hence, debt financing should be supporting spending that maximises the impact on growth and helps to ensure debt sustainability in the near term as the economies continue on a path of further diversification to reduce dependence on oil resources and the need for continued large government spending to support growth.

Diversification of sources of financing requires careful macroeconomic management. Rising public debt could have adverse effects on economic growth if it crowds out private activity and shakes investors’ confidence.

Moreover, managing external debt is a high priority in the region since most countries, except for Kuwait, peg their domestic currencies to the US dollar. Sustaining the stability of the peg requires adequate international reserves to meet external liabilities and stem speculative attacks on the peg.

But maintaining the stability of the peg has proven to be costly for economies that seek to diversify and reduce their continued dependence on oil revenues. Specifically, the direction of US monetary policy has been going against the economic cycle that has slowed down with the oil price in the GCC countries.

Hence, fiscal policies should continue to play a bigger countercyclical role, while safeguarding fiscal sustainability. The GCC countries cannot afford continued pro-cyclicality of fiscal policy – that is, a sharp fiscal consolidation – in line with the decline in oil revenues, which has exacerbated the economic cycle and prolonged economic slowdown.

Therefore, fiscal reforms and diversifying sources of financing are necessary to increase the space for countercyclical fiscal policy to respond to unforeseen shocks from the global economy and continued volatility of oil prices. In parallel, coordination between fiscal and monetary policies is necessary for domestic liquidity management and issuance of debt towards sustaining the course of economic diversification and higher non-energy growth.

The ultimate goal is to safeguard priority spending and ensure adequate liquidity in support of private sector activity and non-energy growth.

Ensuring fiscal sustainability

As higher oil prices have historically helped to sustain higher fiscal primary balances in the GCC countries, the ‘new normal’ of a ‘low for long’ oil price coupled with high oil price volatility does not bode well for sustained improvement in the primary fiscal balances. This warrants additional efforts to prioritise and diversify revenues towards more fiscal consolidation, without compromising non-energy growth objectives.

To that end, low oil prices provide an opportunity to press ahead with energy subsidy reforms, to increase efficiency and to reduce unproductive spending, in order to increase the fiscal primary balance and ensure debt sustainability despite the need to issue more debt to finance the deficit and safeguard priority spending.

Enduring fiscal deficits in the near term are not a problem, but managing and financing those deficits without compromising non-energy growth and debt sustainability objectives are the key challenge.

Our empirical research has focused on evaluating the long-run sustainability of GCC public finances by estimating a ‘reaction function’ of the government’s primary balance to determine whether the authorities are pursuing appropriate policies to avert excessive debt accumulation, rein in the deficit and reform public finances.

The main finding reveals that the primary balance is not affected only by the oil price but also by oil price volatility. High volatility makes it difficult to sustain a stable stream of revenues in the budget in support of a higher primary balance as well as to adjust spending plans to oil revenues, particularly for oil-exporting countries with a high share of oil revenues in the budget.

Moreover, our results show that GCC countries are still running a sustainable fiscal policy and that public finances have improved in response to recent fiscal adjustments and reforms. The evidence illustrates that the issuance of debt, which has been accelerated in the wake of the ‘low for long’ oil price to diversify sources of financing, has been coupled with a higher drive for fiscal consolidation to increase the primary balance and render the public debt sustainable over time.

But national experiences differ considerably, especially given variation in the fiscal breakeven prices against the ‘new normal’ of low oil prices.

Going forward

Overall, by diversifying the sources of funding their budgets, sustaining growth momentum and pressing ahead with necessary reforms to increase the primary fiscal balance, GCC countries can reduce the risks of entering a vicious cycle of low non-energy growth and unsustainable debt.

To that end, by enforcing better management and prioritisation of expenditure outlays, as well as diversifying sources of non-energy revenues in the budget, GCC governments stand a good chance of overcoming the near-term challenges of adjusting to ‘low for long’ oil prices while building their capacities to afford more investments and diversify their economies.

Sustaining the momentum of non-energy growth would reduce the dependence of GCC countries on oil revenues and fiscal spending in the medium term, create greater scope for private sector participation in economic activity, and increase the prospects of further diversification away from long dependence on oil price volatility and its adverse implications for the fiscal budget and economic cycles.

Most read

Why the West got rich and the Middle East did not

Today’s rulers of the three largest Middle Eastern economies all look to religious authorities as a key source of legitimacy. Drawing on a broad sweep of historical analysis, this column explores what this might mean for the region’s economic future. One notable danger is that the types of people who would push for policies that promote long-run growth are excluded from the political bargaining table.

Why Turkish growth ended

Following a period of rapid economic growth, the Turkish economy has slowed significantly since 2007. This column argues that these economic ups and downs reflect institutional improvements in the aftermath of the country’s 2001 financial crisis, followed by an ominous slide in the quality of these economic and political institutions.

Implications of the current low oil prices for MENA countries

The current low oil price environment, in part driven by the US shale oil revolution, has important macroeconomic implications for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). This column reports research evidence on its likely impact on both oil-exporting and oil-importing countries in the region.

Prospects for development with democracy in the Arab world

What are the prospects for democracy in the Arab world? This column expresses the hope that as conflict-afflicted countries embark on their programmes of economic reconstruction, autocratic institutions will not be re-established under the pretext of the need for a speedy and steady recovery. The optimal path of development necessarily includes robust growth, equity as well as democracy.

An agenda for reducing income inequality in the Arab countries

What can be done to reduce income inequality in Arab countries? This column explores issues of measurement as well as potential policy measures. It concludes by calling for a new multipurpose pan-Arab survey that would allow for an evidence-based decision-making process on the impact of proposed policies on poverty and inequality.

The United Arab Emirates’ dilemma

As energy-producing economies strive to reduce their reliance on oil revenues, they must strike a balance between the competing demands of fiscal sustainability and steady growth of the non-energy sector. This column outlines how the United Arab Emirates is addressing this challenge.

Freedom for women is crucial for economic progress in MENA

The Middle East was once the cradle of civilisation: can it prosper once again? Looking back at lessons from the European Enlightenment, this column argues that if the region wants to advance economically, it needs to advance in terms of its treatment of women. Female agency is central to understanding the West’s technological leadership of the past two centuries.

Inequality in higher education: Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia

Attainment of higher education is strikingly unequal in Egypt and Tunisia, and a little less so in Jordan. This column reports research showing that in all three countries, family background is the primary driver of inequality. Particularly in Egypt and Tunisia, public spending on higher education is regressive, with the result that what purports to be a meritocratic and equitable system in reality perpetuates inequality.

Oil exporters’ responses to the US fracking boom

What are the implications of low oil prices for the economic and political stability of Arab oil-exporting countries such as Saudi Arabia? This column explores the impact of the US fracking boom on Arab oil revenues – and how policy-makers in these countries should respond.

Pension reform that avoids harming MENA labour markets

To tackle the deficits in their pension systems, should governments in Arab countries raise social security contributions, reduce pension levels or increase the statutory retirement age? This column summarises the results of research assessing the costs and benefits of different pension reforms in terms of their impact on different generations and on the labour market.