Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Going beyond Doing Business to foster job creation

The World Bank’s Doing Business rankings provide a useful benchmark, but making them a key policy goal is inappropriate for Arab countries where the reform agenda needs to be far more wide-ranging. This column argues for a more practical and effective approach to creating business environments that will attract investment and foster job creation.

In a nutshell

A better performance in the World Bank’s annual Doing Business rankings is thought to attract job-creating investment.

Such a policy goal is insufficient to foster investment and job creation in Arab countries.

Arab policy-makers need to embrace a broader approach – one that includes structural reforms to reduce business-government transaction costs, enhance competitiveness and increase investment returns.

Policy-makers in Arab countries should not rely solely on the World Bank’s Doing Business rankings to improve the business environment and foster investment and job creation. Informative as it is, as an analytical instrument, Doing Business is not enough to capture the ground-level complexities of the economic environment in most Arab countries (Haidar and Larbi, 2016).

What Doing Business rankings do and do not measure

The key issue is what the rankings do and do not measure. First, Doing Business treats all indicators as if they were equally important in all sectors. The indicators neither cover all aspects of the costs of doing business nor factor in issues specific to individual countries. Moreover, most of the indicators are one-time or infrequent occurrences – such as construction permits or business registrations – and do not capture the daily hurdles and associated costs that businesses face.

Second, Doing Business does not look into the reasons behind the poor performance of a country on a given indicator. Poor performance may be due to policies or regulations and can stem from low capacities and deficient practices of implementing agencies. In the latter case, Doing Business fails to capture the administrative practices and complex procedures applied on the ground.

For example, rampant corruption and lack of accountability increase the cost of doing business even when regulations are streamlined and theoretically easy to comply with. While Doing Business indicators may provide a good assessment of certain regulatory frameworks, they do not show how they function in practice or why they might be dysfunctional.

Third, Doing Business does not capture many relevant dimensions of the business environment in Arab countries. For example, if enterprises lack access to formal credit, the efficiency of the credit registry might not be relevant. Similarly, if a large numbers of enterprises are not in the formal sector (30-50% in most Arab countries), they do not have access to finance or to the formal court system for contract enforcement.

Fourth, Doing Business does not take account of major institutional factors, such as political stability, social tensions and rule of law. Likewise, macroeconomic and monetary policies are key factors for the business environment, but they do not feature in the Doing Business indicators.

Fifth, the Doing Business rankings are relative. If a country improves its business environment, it will only move up the ranking if it improves more than other countries. Similarly, a country can maintain or improve its ranking if other countries fall behind in terms of certain business regulations.

Going beyond Doing Business rankings

Policy-makers need to go beyond Doing Business rankings to inform policy debates about job creation. They need to formulate more comprehensive structural reforms in support of doing business not only at the entry point, but also throughout the lifecycle of enterprises.

Doing Business rankings work well as a catalyst for competition among countries and policy debates in support of enhancing private sector development. But such rankings should be used with caution. Indeed, it is common – but almost never wise – to think that the goal of policy should be to improve countries’ Doing Business rankings.

For example, to measure the difficulty of dealing with licences, Doing Business examines the burden of obtaining a construction permit to build a warehouse. But depending on the type of business, the operation of the warehouse may require several other licences and permits that may be more or less easy to obtain but not covered by Doing Business indicators. Typically, countries that regard raising their ranking as an important key policy goal may not see the need to improve licensing procedures in other areas not covered by the Doing Business.

Arab policy-makers should use the Doing Business indicators after understanding what they do and do not measure. One way to use them productively is to call on complementary analytical work. This might include investment climate assessments (more comprehensive firm surveys), country policy reviews (carried out by countries themselves and/or development agencies), and country diagnostic assessments (a product recently developed by the World Bank). The goal would be to identify constraints on investment, firm growth and job creation.

In other words, Doing Business rankings should be considered complementary, helping either to target or guide some of the reforms aiming at improving the business environment of a country. For example, a long bureaucratic delay to register a new business is an important indicator of the need to improve the business entry process.

But the policy reform should go beyond reducing the registration paper work or improving the administrative process. Access to finance, availability of ready space to occupy or developed land for new construction, as well as institutional support for new start-ups and other incentives, should be considered if policy-makers want to improve the business environment in a sustainable manner.

The Doing Business rank-improvement approach is best treated as part of a broader set of tools that policy-makers can use to reform public institutions. The soundness of this approach is supported by recent research on the effects of improving the business environment and institutional frameworks. There is a growing consensus that the quality of business regulation and the institutions that enforce it are major determinants of economic prosperity – see, for example, Haidar, (2009, 2012).

That said, a full assessment of the business environment faced by enterprises in a specific country should go beyond cross-country comparisons of Doing Business indicators and firm-level assessments. It needs to be more inclusive in terms of policy areas that directly or indirectly affect the quality of the business environment over time.

For example, the following areas are also important for investment decisions and thus for the business environment: the quality of human capital and skills; access to finance, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); the quality of infrastructure services; and logistics and cross-border trade facilitation.

Last but not least, another key policy concern for Arab countries is the growth of obstacles facing firms, especially SMEs. Most new firms either disappear after a few years of operation or remain small with at most one or two employees. Only a tiny proportion of firms move up the scale to become medium or large firms. Doing Business does not cover this issue, but addressing the root causes of the lack of growth of existing and new SMEs should constitute another priority reform.

Further reading

Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim (2009) ‘Protecting Investors and Economic Growth’, Economics Letters 103:1-4.

Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim (2012) ‘The Impact of Business Regulatory Reforms on Economic Growth’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 26: 285-307.

Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim, and Hedi Larbi (2016) ‘Going Beyond Doing Business to Foster Job Creation in Arab Countries’, ERF Policy Brief No. 7.

Most read

Fair competition is needed to empower women economically in the Arab world

The participation rates of women in the labour market in Arab countries are the lowest in the world. This column argues that remedying the under-representation of women in the labour force is a social and economic imperative for the region. There are three dimensions for action to realise the potential of Arab women: amending laws and regulations; instilling fair competition in markets; and promoting the digital economy.

Arab countries are caught in an inequality trap

Conventional wisdom, based mainly on surveyed household income distribution statistics, suggests that inequality is generally low in Arab countries. At the same time, little attention has been devoted to social inequalities, whether in terms of outcomes or opportunities. This column introduces a forthcoming report, which offers a different narrative: based on the largest research project on the subject to date and covering 12 Arab countries, the authors argue that the region is caught in an inequality trap.

Recession without impact: why Lebanese elites delay reform

The survival of Lebanon’s political elites is highly dependent on the wellbeing of the economy. Why then do they delay necessary reform to avoid crisis? This column examines the role of politically connected firms in delaying much-needed economic stabilisation policies.

Competition laws: a key role for economic growth in MENA

Competition policy lacks the attention it deserves in the countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), a region characterised by monopolies and lack of market contestability. As this column explains, there are many questions about the extent of anti-competitive barriers facing new market entrants in the region. What’s more, MENA’s weak overall performance on competition is likely to be hindering economic growth and the path towards structural transformation.

The Egyptian economy is still not creating good jobs

Growth in Egypt has recovered substantially since the downturn following the global financial crisis and the political instability following the 2011 revolution – but what has happened to jobs? This column reports the results on employment conditions from just released data in the 2018 wave of the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey.

How Egyptian households cope with shocks: new evidence

Managing risks and reducing vulnerability to economic, social, environmental and health shocks enhances the wellbeing of households and encourages investment in human capital. This column explores the nature of shocks experienced by Egyptian households as well as the coping mechanisms that they use. It also examines the relationship between such risks and job formality and health status.

The future of Egypt’s population: opportunities and challenges

Egypt’s potential labour supply depends on the growth and changing composition of its working-age population. This column reports the latest data on labour supply and fertility rates, concluding that the country has a window of opportunity with reduced demographic pressures to try to address longstanding structural challenges for the labour market.

Egypt’s labour market: facts and prospects

An ERF policy conference on the Egyptian labour market in late October 2019 focused on gender and economic vulnerability. This column summarises the key takeaways from the event.

An appeal for Sudan’s future

Sudan today is on a knife-edge: it can evolve toward peace and democracy – or spiral into instability and violence. As this Project Syndicate column argues, vital and timely international assistance can make the difference between success and failure for the new government.

Domestic demand and competition: a new development paradigm for MENA

A lack of competition in domestic and regional markets is holding back development in the Middle East and North Africa. This column argues that the region and the international community must ensure that barriers to market entry and exit are eliminated, and that independent regulatory bodies at the national and regional levels help to promote domestic demand as the main engine for sustainable and inclusive growth.