Economic Research Forum (ERF)

The environmental impact of foreign direct investment in MENA

2068
Are countries in the Middle East and North Africa ‘pollution havens’ when it comes to foreign direct investment (FDI) – or do they merit a ‘pollution halo’? This column reports evidence on how the quality of economies’ institutions and human capital influences the environmental impact of FDI.

In a nutshell

The direct effect of foreign direct investment is to increase carbon emissions in MENA economies, although the precise relationship with pollution depends on a country’s characteristics, including human capital, and institutional quality and governance.

Foreign direct investment leads to pollution in MENA economies with a less educated labour force and an unfavourable institutional environment; it lowers pollution in countries with more educated workers and a favourable institutional environment.

Policies aiming to improve human capital and the institutional environment may be expected to enrich not only the economic benefits of foreign direct investment in terms of growth, but also to mitigate its negative environmental effects.

Economies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) face serious environmental vulnerabilities, including air pollution, loss of biodiversity and inadequate waste management. In addition, the extensive use of gaseous and liquid fuel (as a percentage of total consumption – see Figure 1) and non-renewable energy resources in production tends to draw attention to environmental concerns by increasing emissions levels.

High emissions may impede MENA economies from achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aim to promote the green economy. ‘Greening’ is related to the low-carbon energy transitions aiming for access to renewable energy sources, reducing poverty and creating jobs (Siciliano et al, 2021).

A recent report from the World Bank (Heger et al, 2022) remarks that a green, resilient and inclusive development (GRID) trajectory will provide sustainable growth in MENA economies. Accordingly, GRID growth trajectory is expected to lower emissions, mitigate environmental degradation, support the sustainability of the environment and thus enable MENA economies to achieve the SDGs.

Figure 1: Sources of carbon emissions in MENA

Emissions levels can be affected by income per capita, energy consumption, technological innovation, trade openness, urbanisation and inflows of foreign direct investment (FDI). Among these, the last, FDI, is one of the most important.

Conventionally, FDI provides many benefits including efficient capital allocation, access to financial markets and new technology, increasing total factor productivity and growth. Figure 2 represents the evolution of FDI in low-, middle- and high-income economies along with MENA. FDI inflows to MENA economies tend to be much lower than in other country groupings.

Figure 2: Evolution of FDI inflows

The impact of FDI on the environment is one of the important policy concerns for the authorities. The relationship between FDI and pollution can be explained with pollution haven or halo arguments.

The pollution haven argument maintains that FDI linkages may allow the movement of pollution-intensive economic activities to countries with lax environmental restrictions and regulations. The pollution halo argument, on the other hand, suggests that international firms with high environmental quality may bring sophisticated, energy-efficient, environmentally cleaner technologies to host economies along with better environmental management systems.

Figure 3 shows the scatter plot of FDI and carbon emissions. There is a positive association between FDI and emissions up to a certain threshold level and then this relation reverses in MENA.

Figure 3: FDI inflows and carbon emissions

The prevailing characteristics of a country, including its human capital and governance, may affect the impact of FDI on pollution with different transmission mechanisms. For example, a more educated labour force demands a cleaner environment, encourages the use of renewable energy products, promotes energy efficiency and tends to adopt better environmental regulation as well as greener technology.

On the other hand, economies with well-established rules, norms and regulations allow them to implement environmental protection policies. In this context, we can maintain that the positive association between FDI and emissions in Figure 3 may belong to economies with weak country characteristics. On the flip side, the negative association between FDI and emissions in Figure 3 may be related with the economies with better country characteristics.

Pollution haven or halo?

Our study finds that the direct effect of FDI is to increase emissions in MENA. But it may be misleading to assume that the sensitivity of FDI to pollution is the same in economies with weak and better country characteristics. Better characteristics – that is a more educated labour force and a more favourable institutional environment – can attract higher FDI.

In this context, we can maintain that prevailing country characteristics may affect the relationship between FDI and pollution. We find that prevailing country characteristics provide a threshold for the effect of FDI on emissions. This can imply that the relationship between FDI and emissions can change with the level of country characteristics.

Our results suggest that FDI leads to higher emissions in economies with weak country characteristics, including a less educated labour force and an unfavourable institutional environment. On the other hand, FDI lowers emissions in countries with strong country characteristics containing a better educated labour force and a favourable institutional environment.

Our empirical findings indicate that the pollution haven argument holds economies with weak country characteristics while the pollution halo argument holds in the case of economies with better country characteristics. This outcome appears to be hold in both oil-exporting and oil-importing MENA economies.

Our results suggest that policies aiming to improve human capital and the institutional environment may be expected to enrich not only the economic benefits of FDI in terms of growth but also to mitigate its negative environmental effects. Investing in human capital also eases the employment of environment-friendly technologies and increases environmental awareness.

Consistent with an argument maintaining that a good institutional environment is closely associated with the implementation of better environmental protection policies, improvement in institutional quality and governance is expected to reduce both emissions and the degradational effect of FDI.

Based on our empirical findings, policies aiming to promote energy efficiency, energy conservation and emissions-diminishing technologies may alleviate the pollution. These policies may lead countries to succeed in achieving goals that promote green economy.

GRID growth trajectory can reduce emissions, alleviate environmental degradation, encourage environmental sustainability, mitigate poverty, provide job creation and thus allow MENA economies to achieve the SDGs.

Environmental management systems aiming to reduce emissions may require institutional and regulatory reforms, green investment, better governance, regional cooperation and participation of all stakeholders. Xing and Kolstad (2002) suggest the necessity of cooperative solutions to overcome pollution since the environmental policy gap leads the movement of polluting production activities to economies with lax environmental regulations.

The World Bank report (Heger et al, 2022) proposes a ‘4 I’s’ rule for MENA economies including ‘Inform stakeholders, provide Incentives, strengthen Institutions, and Invest in abatement options’ to solve environmental problem. All these may be considered as key factors to overcome the problem of environmental degradation in MENA.

Further reading

Abdouli, M, and S Hammami (2017) ‘Investigating the causality links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment and economic growth in MENA countries’, International Business Review 26(2): 264-78.      

Heger, Martin Philipp, L Vashold, A Palacios, M Alahmadi, M Bromhead and M Acerbi (2022) ‘Blue Skies, Blue Seas Air Pollution, Marine Plastics, and Coastal Erosion in the Middle East and North Africa.’ Middle East and North Africa Development Report, World Bank.

Siciliano, G, L Wallbott, F Urban, AN Dang and M Lederer (2021) ‘Low-carbon energy, sustainable development, and justice: towards a just energy transition for the society and the environment’, Sustainable Development 29: 1049-61.         

Taşdemir, F, and S Ekmen-Özçelik (2022) ‘Do Human Capital and Governance Thresholds Matter for the Environmental Impact of FDI? The Evidence from MENA Countries’, ERF Working Paper No. 1608.

Xing, Y, and CD Kolstad (2002) ‘Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment?’, Environmental and Resource Economics 21(1): 1-22.

Most read

Adoption of decentralised solar energy: lessons from Palestinian households

The experience of Palestinian households offers a compelling case study of behavioural adaptation to energy poverty via solar water heater adoption. This column highlights the key barriers to solar energy adoption in terms of both the socio-economic status and dwellings of potential users. Policy-makers need to address these barriers to ensure a just and equitable transition, particularly for households in conflict-affected areas across the MENA region.

Migration, human capital and labour markets in MENA

Migration is a longstanding and integral part of the MENA region’s economic and social fabric, with profound implications for labour markets and human capital development. To harness the potential of migration for promoting economic and social development, policy-makers must aim to deliver mutual benefits for origin countries, host countries and migrants. Such a triple-win strategy requires better data, investment in return migration, skill partnerships, reduced remittance costs and sustained support for host countries.

Shifting gears: how the private sector can be an engine of growth in MENA

Businesses are a key source of productivity growth, innovation and jobs. But in the Middle East and North Africa, the private sector is not dynamic and the region has a long history of low growth. This column summarises a new report explaining how a brighter future for MENA’s private sector is within reach if governments rethink their role and firms harness talent effectively.

Building net-zero futures: Asian lessons for MENA’s construction sector

Three big economies in Asia are achieving carbon neutrality in construction. This column draws lessons from Japan, Taiwan and Thailand – and explains why, given the vast solar potential and growing focus on environmental, social and governance matters in the Middle East and North Africa, governments in the region must adopt similarly ambitious policies and partnerships.

Losing the key to joy: how oil rents undermine patience and economic growth

How does reliance on oil revenues shape economic behaviour worldwide? This column reports new research showing that oil rents weaken governance, eroding patience – a key driver of economic growth and, according to the 13th century Persian poet Rumi, ‘the key to joy’. Policy measures to counter the damage include enhancing transparency in oil revenue management, strengthening independent oversight institutions and ensuring that sovereign wealth funds have robust rules of governance.

Artificial intelligence and the future of employment in MENA

Artificial intelligence offers opportunities for boosting productivity and innovation. But it also poses substantial threats to traditional employment structures, particularly in economies like those in the Middle East and North Africa that are reliant on low-skill or routine labour. This column explores how AI is likely to affect employment across the region and proposes policy directions for governments to harness AI for inclusive and sustainable economic growth.

Freedom, agency and material conditions: human development in MENA

Conventional approaches to measuring human development, which are primarily centred on income, health and education, provide an incomplete assessment of people’s opportunities to improve their lives. As this column explains, it is essential to understand how institutional and social environments influence individuals’ agency over their development outcomes. Analysis of the diverse recent experiences of Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia illustrates how such an approach can inform policy-making.

Fiscal limits and debt sustainability in MENA economies

Public debt is piling up across the Middle East and North Africa after years of political upheavals, economic shocks and the Covid-19 pandemic. With fiscal space shrinking, governments are under pressure to act. This column explains why for many countries in the region, the room for manoeuvre on the public finances may be smaller than policy-makers think. Urgent action is needed to restore debt sustainability.

Market integration in the Middle East and the Balkans, 1560-1914

Trade has re-emerged as a central issue in global policy debates, as governments debate not only the costs and benefits of trade, but also the underlying determinants of market integration. To inform the discussion, this column reports new research evidence on the experiences of the former Ottoman territories in the Middle East and the Balkans over nearly four centuries, tracing the evolution, drivers and consequences of trade integration across these regions.

From rentier states to innovation economies: is a MENA transition possible?

The combination of climate change, energy price volatility, high unemployment among educated youth, and global technological competition is exposing the vulnerabilities of MENA’s traditional economic structures and the need for structural transformation. This column examines whether such a transition is feasible and the policies that could promote such a shift.