Economic Research Forum (ERF)

How Egyptian households cope with shocks: new evidence

2163
Managing risks and reducing vulnerability to economic, social, environmental and health shocks enhances the wellbeing of households and encourages investment in human capital. This column explores the nature of shocks experienced by Egyptian households as well as the coping mechanisms that they use. It also examines the relationship between such risks and job formality and health status.

In a nutshell

Almost a quarter of households in Egypt experienced food insecurity and 16% were exposed to at least one type of economic shock during the year 2017/18.

Poor households were four times as likely to have experienced food insecurity and more than twice as likely to have experienced shocks compared with rich households.

Households mostly used ‘consumption rationing’ – reduced spending on health, food or education – and social capital to cope with economic shocks or food insecurity.

Rural and urban households face different risks that could lead to adverse economic shocks. Poverty and vulnerability to shocks are interlinked given the limited opportunities of poor households to use assets or diversify income (Dercon, 2002). The 2018 wave of the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey (ELMPS) allows us to explore the nature of economic shocks and food insecurity experienced by Egyptian households as well as the preventive measures and coping mechanisms that they adopt. We find that there is still a need for more effective social programmes with wider coverage to mitigate household vulnerability to shocks and food insecurity.

Around 16% of Egyptian households were exposed to at least one type of shock during the year preceding the ELMPS interview. As Figure 1 shows, economic shocks were the most frequently reported type of shocks. Reduced income (12%) followed by loss of employment (7%) were the most prevalent types of economic shocks. In addition, around 25% of the households experienced food insecurity during the month preceding the survey. About 15% of households experienced food insecurity alone, while about 10% experienced both food insecurity and at least one type of shock simultaneously (Helmy and Roushdy, 2019).

Figure 1: Percentage of households exposed to shocks during the past year by type of shock

Source: Helmy and Roushdy (2019). Note: Multiple shocks are possible

Households in the poorest quintile by wealth (23%) were more than twice as likely to experience a shock as those in the fourth (12%) and fifth (9%) wealth quintile groups. Similarly, the likelihood of exposure to food insecurity was higher among the poorest households. About 39% of the poorest quintile households experienced food insecurity compared with only 11% of the richest quintile households.

Disability and food insecurity were linked. This relationship is as expected since both food insecurity and disability are higher among the poor. In addition, exposure to shocks was associated with low subjective wellbeing (Sieverding and Hassan, 2019).

Exposure to shocks was higher in rural areas than in urban areas. More households were exposed to shocks in rural Upper Egypt (21%) and rural Lower Egypt (20%), followed by the Alexandria and Suez Canal region (19%), Urban Upper Egypt (15%), Urban Lower Egypt (14%) and Greater Cairo (3%).

There was a similar regional disparity for food insecurity, which was higher in the 1,000 poorest villages (31%), followed by other rural areas (28%) and 21% among urban households. The two regions that had the highest rates of food insecurity were rural Upper Egypt (32%) and Alexandria and Suez Canal (31%) (Helmy and Roushdy, 2019).

In terms of social protection coverage, around 57% of Egyptian households received either non-contributory benefits (such as Sadat/Mubarak pensions, Takaful and/or Karama, and other types of social assistance) or contributory benefits (such as retirement pensions) compared with 62% in 2012 and 68% in 2006. This decline could be due to the decrease in the percentage of households with at least one actively contributing member as well as the drop in social insurance coverage (Selwaness and Ehab, 2019).

The decrease in health insurance and social security coverage (Selwaness and Ehab, 2019) is alarming given that informality of employment is associated with exposure to shocks among households. Households with heads working in the informal private sector were twice as likely to be exposed to a shock (20%), compared with households with heads working in the formal private or public sectors (10-11%). In addition, around 23% of the households with heads working outside an establishment were exposed to a shock compared with only 12% among those of heads working inside an establishment (Helmy and Roushdy, 2019).

On the other hand, the percentage of households covered by any type of social assistance transferred by the government increased from 9% in 2006 to 13% in 2018 (Selwaness and Ehab, 2019). Despite receiving social assistance, beneficiary households still reported higher exposure to risks compared with non-beneficiary households. For example, 31% of households that received Takaful or Karama were exposed to shocks compared with 15% among non-recipient households. The results were similar for other social assistance and food ration cards.

Food insecurity was common among households receiving social assistance and food ration cards. Over a quarter of the households that received food ration cards suffered from food insecurity during the month preceding the ELMPS survey.

Furthermore, the degree of food insecurity was highest among households receiving Takaful and Karama conditional cash transfers or other types of social assistance. Less than 9% of the households receiving retirement pensions reported severe food insecurity compared with 18% of the households receiving social assistance and 15% of the Takaful and Karama beneficiaries (Helmy and Roushdy, 2019).

In contrast to social assistance, households with health insurance were less likely to experience a shock in 2017/18: 15% versus 18% among those without health insurance. The case was similar for those with social insurance: 11% experienced a shock versus 19% among those without social insurance.

Looking at strategies adopted by households to cope with shocks, Figure 2 shows that ‘consumption rationing’ (55%) followed by borrowing (43%) were the two most frequently reported coping mechanisms. Social capital was an important safety net, as almost a third (29%) of Egyptian households reported seeking assistance from relatives and friends in response to a shock (Helmy and Roushdy, 2019).

Figure 2: Percentage of households using different coping mechanisms, households with shocks during the past year

Source: Helmy and Roushdy (2019). Notes: Multiple strategies are possible

About 28% of households borrowed money from their relatives or friends, while 5% borrowed from a bank or a moneylender. Consumption rationing as a coping strategy primarily consisted of reduced spending on health (36%), eating less food (35%) and lower spending on education (22%).

Borrowing and purchasing on credit were more prevalent as coping strategies among households headed by men, while assistance from neighbours, relatives and friends were more frequently reported by households headed by women. Similarly, around 34% of the households that experienced food insecurity borrowed or purchased food on credit, while 19% received assistance from neighbours, relatives and friends to cope with food insecurity.

Our findings point out to the importance of providing poor households with formal shock-responsive social safety nets. Safety nets need to be flexible and sufficient to strengthen households’ capacity to respond to shocks without using stressful coping strategies that harm their human capital.

Increasing social and health insurance coverage is crucial given that our results show access to formal, inside establishment jobs and to social security benefits were associated with considerably lower exposure to shocks and food insecurity in Egypt.

Further reading

Dercon, S (2002) ‘Income Risk, Coping Strategies, and Safety Nets’, World Bank Research Observer 17(2): 141-66.

Helmy, I, and R Roushdy (2019) ‘Household Vulnerability and Resilience to Shocks in Egypt, ERF Working Paper (forthcoming).

Selwaness, I, and M Ehab (2019) ‘Social Protection and Vulnerability in Egypt: A Gendered Analysis’, ERF Working Paper (forthcoming).

Sieverding, M, and R Hassan (2019) ‘Associations between Economic Vulnerability and Health and Wellbeing in Egypt, ERF Working Paper (forthcoming).

 

Tags: , , , ,

Most read

Egypt’s labour market: new survey data for evidence-based decision-making

As Egypt faces substantial social and economic shifts, understanding the labour market is crucial for designing policies that promote employment and inclusive economic growth. This column introduces the latest wave of the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey, which provides fresh, nationally representative data that are vital for examining these dynamics.

The evolution of labour supply in Egypt

Egypt stands at a critical point in its demographic and labour market evolution. As this column explains, while fertility rates have dropped, reducing long-term demographic pressures, the ‘echo generation’, children of the youth bulge, will soon enter the labour market, intensifying the need for policies to accelerate job creation. At the same time, participation in the labour force, particularly among women and young people, is declining, partly as a result of discouragement.

Towards a productive, inclusive and green economy in MENA

Decarbonisation of the global economy is a huge opportunity for countries in the Middle East and North Africa. As this column explains, they can supercharge their development by breaking into fast-growing industries that will help the world to reduce its emissions and reach net zero, as well as offering greater employment opportunities and new export lines. Micro, small and medium enterprises in the region can lead the transition to a cleaner and sustainable future, but this may require the formation of clusters of firms that overcome some of the constraints that their limited size could involve.

Participation of Arab countries in global value chains

To what extent are countries in the Arab region participating in the global value chains (GVCs) that now dominate world trade? What are the main determinants of engagement in GVCs? And what are the expected benefits for Arab countries from joining them? This column answers these questions, concluding that it is important to focus on the products in which countries both enjoy a natural comparative advantage and can increase domestic value added in the intermediate and final parts of the production process.

Climate change: a growing threat to sustainable development in Tunisia

Tunisia’s vulnerability to extreme weather events is intensifying, placing immense pressure on vital sectors such as agriculture, energy and water resources, exacerbating inequalities and hindering social progress. This column explores the economic impacts of climate change on the country, its implications for achieving the sustainable development goals, and the urgent need for adaptive strategies and policy interventions.

Growth in the Middle East and North Africa

What is the economic outlook for the Middle East and North Africa? How is the current conflict centred in Gaza affecting economies in the region? What are the potential long-term effects of conflict on development? And which strategies can MENA countries adopt to accelerate economic growth? This column outlines the findings in the World Bank’s latest half-yearly MENA Economic Update, which answers these questions and more.

Assessing Jordan’s progress on the sustainable development goals

Global, regional and national assessments of countries’ progress towards reaching the sustainable development goals do not always tell the same story. This column examines the case of Jordan, which is among the world’s leaders in statistical performance on the SDGs.

Rising influence: women’s empowerment within Arab households

In 2016 and again in 2022, a reliable poll of public opinion in the Arab world asked respondents in seven countries whether they agreed with the statement that ‘a man should have final say in all decisions concerning the family’. As this column reports, the changing balance of responses between the two surveys gives an indication of whether there been progress in the distribution of decision-making within households towards greater empowerment of women.

Unleashing the potential of Egyptian exports for sustainable development

Despite several waves of trade liberalisation, Egypt’s integration in the world economy has remained modest. In addition, the structure of its exports has not changed and remains largely dominated by traditional products. This column argues that the government should develop a new export strategy that is forward-looking by taking account not only of the country’s comparative advantage, but also how global demand evolves. The strategy should also be more inclusive and more supportive of sustainable development.

International and regional financial integration in MENA

What are the effects of financial integration at both the regional and international level on the domestic economies of the Middle East and North Africa? This column summarises new research evidence on this question. The results suggest that while regional financial integration offers substantial benefits, ‘too much’ international integration could hinder financial development.