Economic Research Forum (ERF)

International and regional financial integration in MENA

1227
What are the effects of financial integration at both the regional and international level on the domestic economies of the Middle East and North Africa? This column summarises new research evidence on this question. The results suggest that while regional financial integration offers substantial benefits, ‘too much’ international integration could hinder financial development.

In a nutshell

For MENA countries, international financial integration has both positive and negative effects, with potential risks that may outweigh the benefits if not managed properly.

Regional financial integration offers a more promising path for fostering financial development and governance; by focusing on regional ties and adopting cautious policies on international financial integration, MENA economies can chart a path to sustained growth and stability.

Good governance is key to maximising the benefits of financial integration: MENA countries should focus on improving the rule of law, reducing corruption and enhancing political stability to create a favourable environment for both international and regional financial flows.

Conventional economic theory suggests that international movement of capital provides many benefits including better risk-sharing, more efficient capital allocation and higher growth. The crisis in many emerging market and developing economies during the 1990s and early 2000s have led to reassessment of the theoretical benefits of financial openness.

A more recent report from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts a slowdown in the growth prospects for both advanced economies and emerging market and developing economies (World Economic Outlook, 2023). Under the pro-cyclicality of capital flows suggested by Kaminsky et al (2004), this projection may imply slowdowns in both financial flows and international financial integration.

These outcomes may prevent countries from reaping the beneficial effects of international financial integration. In this context, regional financial integration has emerged as a complementary subset to international financial integration.

Frey and Volz (2013) define regional financial integration as ‘the process of opening up capital accounts among countries of geographical proximity, including a liberalisation of cross border activities of financial institutions within the integrating area’. Research on this topic, which includes Garcia-Herrero and Wooldridge (2007), Park and Lee (2011) and Eyraud et al (2017), suggests that regional financial integration promotes good practices in financial systems and diminishes their sensitivity to external shocks and asymmetric information.

In a new study, we consider gross stocks of bilateral financial flows data prepared by Pagano et al (2020) to construct a quantity-based measure of regional financial integration in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) economies (Özmen and Taşdemir, 2024). In a similar vein to international financial integration, we define regional financial integration as the sum of gross stocks of financial assets and liabilities (as a percentage of GDP) between the MENA economies.

International financial integration

Figure 1.a shows the evolution of mean international financial integration (the sum of gross stocks of assets and liabilities, as a percentage of GDP) during the period from 1990 to 2021. Accordingly, international financial integration tends to diminish during the first two decades and then it increases during the rest of the period.

In Figure 1.b, international financial integration is broken down into asset and liability flows. Throughout the period, asset flows consistently exceeded liabilities . This indicates that MENA countries are net exporters of capital, possibly reflecting a flight to safety by local investors.

Figure 1: International financial integration in MENA

Regional financial integration: a complementary approach

Figure 2 shows the network diagram of financial flows within MENA. The direction and thickness of arrows denote, respectively, the movement of capital from the reporter to destination country and the size of financial flows between the reporter and destination country.

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates) appear to have more financial asset transactions with each other than non-GCC MENA economies. Bilateral flows between Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey stand out, indicating their roles as regional financial hubs.

Figure 2: Regional financial asset transactions in MENA

Financial development: the effects of international and regional financial integration

A remarkable study by Kose et al (2009) suggests that the beneficial effects of financial integration often operate through indirect channels, such as financial development and governance, ultimately resulting in total factor productivity growth and macroeconomic stability.

Figure 3 shows the evolution of international and regional financial integration along with financial development. It seems that financial development tends to move together not only with international financial integration but also with regional financial integration. But our empirical findings suggest that while ‘too much’ international financial integration mitigates domestic financial development, high levels of regional financial integration promote it.

Figure 3: Financial development and international and regional financial integration in MENA

Governance: the effects of international and regional financial integration

Figure 4 highlights the relationship between governance and both international and regional financial integration in MENA. While governance initially improves with international financial integration, the trend reverses after 2015, raising concerns about the long-term impact of international financial integration on institutional stability.

In contrast, regional financial integration is positively associated with governance, as regional financial ties promote better institutional development. This is particularly important in a region where governance indicators – such as the rule of law, political stability and control of corruption – remain relatively weak.

Our empirical findings suggest that high levels of both international and regional financial integration lead to a better institutional environment by reducing corruption, the increasing rule of law, and promoting government effectiveness and political stability.

Figure 4: Governance and international and regional financial integration in MENA
Conclusion

The debate over financial integration in MENA is far from settled. International financial integration has both positive and negative effects, with potential risks that may outweigh the benefits if not managed properly.

In contrast, regional financial integration offers a more stable and promising path for fostering financial development and governance. By focusing on regional ties and adopting cautious policies towards international financial integration, MENA economies can chart a path to sustained growth and stability.

Policy recommendations

MENA countries should place greater emphasis on regional financial integration, which fosters financial stability and development. By strengthening regional ties, countries can insulate themselves from global financial shocks while building more resilient financial markets.

While international financial integration can bring benefits, MENA economies should focus on macroprudential regulations to mitigate the risks of capital flight and to ensure that domestic financial systems may absorb foreign capital inflows without destabilising effects.

Good governance is a key pillar for maximising the benefits of financial integration. MENA countries should focus on improving rule of law, reducing corruption, and enhancing political stability to create a favourable environment for both international and regional financial flows.

Developing stock and bond markets will be essential for efficiently allocating capital and reducing the reliance on banks, which are often state-owned and inefficient. Encouraging private sector participation and foreign direct investment can help deepen financial markets.

Although GCC countries dominate regional financial flows, broader inclusion of non-GCC MENA economies could lead to stronger regional integration. Expanding regional financial integration across the region will promote shared interests, economic growth and political stability.

Further reading

Eyraud, L, D Singh and BW Sutton (2017) ‘Benefits of global and regional financial integration in Latin America’, IMF Working Paper No. 2017/001.

Frey, L, and U Volz, U (2013) ‘Regional financial integration in Sub‐Saharan Africa – An empirical examination of its effects on financial market development’, South African Journal of Economics 81(1): 79-117.

García-Herrero, A, and P Wooldridge (2007) ‘Global and regional financial integration: Progress in emerging markets’, BIS Quarterly Review 57.

International Monetary Fund (2023) World Economic Outlook 2023.

Kaminsky, GL, CM Reinhart and CA Végh (2004) ‘When it rains, it pours: Procyclical capital flows and macroeconomic policies’, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 19: 11-53.

Kose, MA, E Prasad, K Rogoff and SJ Wei (2009) ‘Financial globalization: A reappraisal’ IMF Staff Papers 56(1): 8-62.

Özmen, E, and F Taşdemir (2024) ‘Structural Domestic Conditions, Regional and International Financial Integrations: Evidence from MENA’, ERF Working Paper No. 1728.

Pagano, A, M Nardo, N Ndacyayisenga and S Zeugner (2020) ‘FINFLOWS: A database for bilateral financial investment stocks and flows’, European Commission, Joint Research Centre.

Park, CY, and JW Lee (2011) ‘Financial integration in emerging Asia: Challenges and prospects’, Asian Economic Policy Review 6(2): 176-98.

Tags: , , , ,

  • Erdal Özmen
    Erdal Özmen
    Professor of Economics, Middle East Technical University
  • Fatma Taşdemir
    Fatma Taşdemir
    Faculty Member, Department of International Trade and Business, Sinop University

Most read

Sanctions and the shrinking size of Iran’s middle class

International sanctions imposed on Iran from 2012 have reduced the size of the country’s middle class, according to new research summarised in this column. The findings highlight the profound social consequences of economic pressure, not least given the crucial role of that segment of society for national innovation, growth and stability. The study underscores the need for policies to safeguard the civilian population in countries targeted by sanctions.

Artificial intelligence and the renewable energy transition in MENA

Artificial intelligence has the potential to bridge the gap between abundant natural resources and the pressing need for reliable, sustainable power in the Middle East and North Africa. This column outlines the constraints and proposes policies that can address the challenges of variability of renewable resources and stress on power grids, and support the transformation of ‘sunlight’ to ‘smart power’.

Green jobs for MENA in the age of AI: crafting a sustainable labour market

Arab economies face a dual transformation: the decarbonisation imperative driven by climate change; and the rapid digitalisation brought by artificial intelligence. This column argues that by strategically managing the green-AI nexus, policy-makers in the region can position their countries not merely as followers adapting to global mandates but as leaders in sustainable innovation.

Egypt’s forgotten democratisation: a challenge to modern myths about MENA

A widely held narrative asserts that countries in the Middle East are inevitably authoritarian. This column reports new research that tracks Egyptian parliamentarians since 1824 to reveal that the region’s struggle with democracy is not in fact about cultural incompatibility: it’s about colonialism disrupting home-grown democratic movements and elite conflicts being resolved through disenfranchisement rather than power-sharing.

MENA integration into global value chains and sustainable development

Despite the geopolitical advantages, abundant natural resources and young populations of many countries in the Middle East and North Africa, they remain on the periphery of global value chains, the international networks of production and service activities that now dominate the world economy. This column explains the positive impact of integration into GVCs on exports and employment; its role in technology transfer and capacity upgrading; and the structural barriers that constrain the region’s involvement. Greater GVC participation can help to deliver structural transformation and sustainable development.

Arab youth and the future of work

The Arab region’s labour markets are undergoing a triple transformation: demographic, digital and green. As this column explains, whether these forces evolve into engines of opportunity or drivers of exclusion for young people will hinge on how swiftly and coherently policy-makers can align education, technology and employment systems to foster adaptive skills, inclusive institutions and innovation-led pathways to decent work.

Wrong finance in a broken multilateral system: red flags from COP30-Belém

With the latest global summit on climate action recently wrapped up, ambitious COP pledges and initiatives continue to miss delivery due to inadequate commitments, weak operationalisation and unclear reporting systems. As this column reports, flows of climate finance remain skewed: loans over grants; climate mitigation more than climate adaptation; and weak accountability across mechanisms. Without grant-based finance, debt relief, climate-adjusted lending and predictable multilateral flows, implementation of promises will fail.

Why political connections are driving business confidence in MENA

This column reports the findings of a new study of how the political ties of firms in the Middle East and North Africa boost business confidence. The research suggests that this optimism is primarily driven by networked access to credit and lobbying, underscoring the need for greater transparency and institutional reform in corporate governance.

Digitalising governance in MENA: opportunities for social justice

Can digital governance promote social justice in MENA – or does it risk deepening inequality and exclusion? This column examines the evolution of digital governance in three sub-regions – Egypt, Jordan and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council – highlighting how data practices, transparency mechanisms and citizen trust shape the social outcomes of technological reform.