Economic Research Forum (ERF)

Arab development as freedom

721
There is widespread discontent and social unrest in the Arab world, a direct result of decades of failed economic and political transitions led by largely autocratic regimes. This column argues that economic development thinkers and practitioners need to present credible alternatives for a new Arab society that meets citizens’ aspirations and restores their essential freedoms.

In a nutshell

We live in a world where economic, political and military power is extremely concentrated in the hands of self-interested minorities.

Increasing the sustainable wellbeing of individuals and societies requires a correction of social and economic inequities – an objective that seems very far from the realities of today’s Arab world.

At the heart of a new Arab society should be rules that can aggregate preferences that respect citizens and their legitimate differences, and, most importantly, their basic freedoms.

Freedom is a basic human right and a cornerstone of human development. A human being born into this world has to be free from destitution, both economic and political, in order to live a better life and pass on a better world to future generations. Removing the barriers to essential freedoms should be the central goal of social and economic policies, as argued by Nobel laureate Amartya Sen in his 1999 book Development as Freedom.

Yet expanding freedoms cannot be achieved in societies where injustice in its different forms prevails. We live in a world where economic, political and military power is extremely concentrated in the hands of self-interested minorities. Increasing the sustainable wellbeing of individuals and societies requires a correction of all these social and economic inequities.

This objective seems very far from the realities of today’s Arab world. Widespread discontent and social unrest are still sweeping across the region – a direct result of decades of failed economic and political transitions led by largely autocratic regimes that survived for a long time.

These regimes succeeded in maintaining their grip on power by moving from social modernising populism to an alliance with elite capital. Governments embraced a consumerist culture at the expense of job-creating investments, with oversized real estate projects and shopping malls owned by state-linked business elites mushrooming everywhere.

This went hand in hand with various forms of repression, especially to control the grievances of the poor who were denied social progress, and a co-opting of the middle class through the use of economic transfers and subsidies. International support for these regimes also provided a lifeline on which they thrived.

The people of the region were therefore caught in a grand authoritarian bargain, where they were forced to trade their political rights against government-driven economic security. This state of affairs led to rising income inequality, rising inequality of opportunities, moderate growth with insufficient job creation, in addition to daily indignities.

Extremist ideologies became more popular in the shadow of oppression, because of their attractive moral critique of the system, and because regimes fostered them as a counterweight to revolutionary tendencies in society.

Young Arab men and women have been the face of the uprisings at least since 2011. They are increasingly raising their voices against their parents’ generation. They are holding them responsible for their social and political exclusion, as the old seem to have erected – with the support of the state – high barriers to entry to the labour market, housing, marriage and even the political sphere.

The 2016 edition of the United Nations Development Programme’s Arab Human Development Report carefully analyses the development outcomes and systematic social exclusion of the more than 105 million youth living in Arab countries. More Arab citizens and especially young people are living in conflict, forcefully displaced, unemployed and otherwise socially and politically excluded than ever before.

Yet at the same time, the Arab region is benefitting from extremely high electronic connectivity (more than 70% of young people in the region have access to social media); high education enrolment, especially among women; and better health outcomes in countries not afflicted by conflict and violence. This contradictory state of affairs offers a window of opportunity that should be seized.

But the route towards progress does not seem to be an easy one. The authoritarian bargain carefully crafted by the ruling regimes – under broad, often sectarian and/or partisan power-sharing umbrellas – has extended its dominance to the family level through the traditional patriarchal social contract.

Guaranteed public sector jobs, nepotism, subsidies and other regime-led economic interventions have allowed families to survive on one (male) breadwinner, thus eroding the bargaining power of women and youth. The rollback of the state and the repeated financial and political crises seem to have shaken this state of affairs.

Economic development thinkers and practitioners need to present credible alternatives for a new Arab society that meets citizens’ aspirations. They should find answers on how to create an attractive and moral economic system; how to reinvent an effective and inclusive state; and how to devise rules that can aggregate preferences that respect citizens and their legitimate differences, and, most importantly, their basic freedoms.

 

Most read

Making trade agreements more environmentally friendly in the MENA region

Trade policy can play a significant role in efforts to decarbonise the global economy. But as this column explains, there need to be more environmental provisions in trade agreements in which developing countries participate – and stronger legal enforcement of those provisions at the international level. The MENA region would benefit substantially from such changes.

Jordan: navigating through multiple crises

Jordan’s real GDP per capita is today no higher than it was 40 years ago. While external factors have undoubtedly had an adverse effect on the country’s economic outcomes, weak macroeconomic management and low public spending on investment and the social sectors have also played a substantial role. This column explores what can be done to reduce high public debt, accelerate private sector development and enhance social outcomes.

Iran’s globalisation and Saudi Arabia’s defence budget

How might Saudi Arabia react to Iran's renewed participation in global trade and investment? This column explores whether the expanding economic globalisation of Iran, following the lifting of nuclear sanctions, could yield a peace dividend for Saudi Arabia, consequently dampening the Middle East arms competition. These issues have attracted increased attention in recent times, notably after a pivotal agreement between the two countries in March 2023, marking the resumption of their political ties after a seven-year conflict.

Egypt and Iraq: amenities, environmental quality and taste for revolution

The Middle East and North Africa is a region marked by significant political turbulence. This column explores a novel dimension of these upheavals: the relationship between people’s satisfaction with, on one hand, the amenities to which they have access and the environmental quality they experience, and, on the other hand, their inclination towards revolutionary actions. The data come from the World Value Survey collected in 2018 in Egypt and Iraq.

Global value chains and domestic innovation: evidence from MENA firms

Global interlinkages play a significant role in enhancing innovation by firms in developing countries. In particular, as this column explains, participation in global value chains fosters a variety of innovation activities. Since some countries in the Middle East and North Africa display a downward trend on measures of global innovation, facilitating the GVC participation of firms in the region is a prospective channel for stimulating underperforming innovation.

Labour market effects of robots: evidence from Turkey

Evidence from developed countries on the impact of automation on labour markets suggests that there can be negative effects on manufacturing jobs, but also mechanisms for workers to move into the services sector. But this narrative may not apply in developing economies. This column reports new evidence from Turkey on the effects of robots on labour displacement and job reallocation.

Food insecurity in Tunisia during and after the Covid-19 pandemic

Labour market instability, rising unemployment rates and soaring food prices due to Covid-19 are among the reasons for severe food insecurity across the world. This grim picture is evident in Tunisia, where the government continues to provide financial and food aid to vulnerable households after the pandemic. But as this column explains, the inadequacy of some public policies is another important factors causing food insecurity.

Manufacturing firms in Egypt: trade participation and outcomes for workers

International trade can play a large and positive role in boosting economic growth, reducing poverty and making progress towards gender equality. These effects result in part from the extent to which trade is associated with favourable labour market outcomes. This column presents evidence of the effects of Egyptian manufacturing firms’ participation in exporting and importing on their workers’ productivity and average wages, and on women’s employment share.

Sustaining entrepreneurship: lessons from Iran

Does entrepreneurial activity naturally return to long-term average levels after big economic disturbances? This column presents new evidence from Iran on trends in entrepreneurship among various categories of firm size, sector and location – and suggests policies that could be effective in promoting entrepreneurial activities.

Do capital inflows cause industrialisation or de-industrialisation?

There is a clear appeal for emerging and developing economies, including those in MENA, to finance investment in manufacturing industry at home with capital inflows from overseas. But as the evidence reported in this column indicates, this is a potentially risky strategy: rather than promoting industrialisation, capital flows can actually lead to lower manufacturing value added and/or a reallocation of resources towards industries with lower technology intensity.